Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 7021338000082; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:27:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TeZ24-00078C-10 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:26:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TeZ23-000783-JR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:26:03 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TeZ21-0007vP-It for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 22:26:02 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAUMQ0wk009199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 23:26:00 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAUMQ0pk014710 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 23:26:00 +0100 Message-ID: <50B93271.50602@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 23:25:53 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1354312507.68170.YahooMailClassic@web132503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1354312507.68170.YahooMailClassic@web132503.mail.ird.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Chris, Many thanks for beeing so active on the band and the lots of reports in the DX cluster! You must have a very good RX equipment and location. Due to the type of receiver (filter and soundcard sample rate) i am using here i am not able to listen on 600m. Thus we have to wait some weeks longer for a first MF QSO. I'm looking forward to that! Then we should go for a CW round of several OPs, causing some confusion and fun and several hours lasting QSOs :-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 6be9408bcc63ba5aab6f1e66e2d5b7ce Subject: Re: LF: MF - DK7FC / DK8ND Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010208040300000302060206" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d750b932bb6d2f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010208040300000302060206 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Chris, Many thanks for beeing so active on the band and the lots of reports in the DX cluster! You must have a very good RX equipment and location. Due to the type of receiver (filter and soundcard sample rate) i am using here i am not able to listen on 600m. Thus we have to wait some weeks longer for a first MF QSO. I'm looking forward to that! Then we should go for a CW round of several OPs, causing some confusion and fun and several hours lasting QSOs :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 30.11.2012 22:55, schrieb Chris Osborn: > LF, MF > > DK7FC calling CQ on 472.2 (599) also DK8ND calling CQ on 472.5 kHz (459) > I could have worked either station if they QSX 502 kHz > > 73 > Chris > G3XIZ > --------------010208040300000302060206 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear Chris,

Many thanks for beeing so active on the band and the lots of reports in the DX cluster! You must have a very good RX equipment and location.
Due to the type of receiver (filter and soundcard sample rate) i am using here i am not able to listen on 600m. Thus we have to wait some weeks longer for a first MF QSO. I'm looking forward to that!
Then we should go for a CW round of several OPs, causing some confusion and fun and several hours lasting QSOs :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 30.11.2012 22:55, schrieb Chris Osborn:
LF, MF

DK7FC calling CQ on 472.2 (599) also DK8ND calling CQ on 472.5 kHz (459)
I could have worked either station if they QSX 502 kHz

73
Chris
G3XIZ
--------------010208040300000302060206--