Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EB72C38000087; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:42:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Te93E-0006RH-IN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:41:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Te93E-0006R8-6L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:41:32 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Te93C-0001U8-LY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:41:31 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qATIfUrK018103 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:41:30 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qATIfT67001072 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:41:29 +0100 Message-ID: <50B7AC55.6030004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 19:41:25 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50B76F28.6040103@princeton.edu> <50B7728C.9050004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <425211790.20121129174759@mterrier.net> <50B7981A.8000804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <3BD64A7C261A4B98BA0FDA8D1B8ED955@White> <50B79F99.30706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50B7A63D.4080205@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50B7A888.2040105@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steinar and Spiros, Many thanks for the reports :-) Looks like it works :-) It was the old message, so 1W was not correct any more. Just restarted the system, back in a few minutes. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: Re: LF: 136 JT9-10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408150b7ac8a0f35 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Steinar and Spiros, Many thanks for the reports :-) Looks like it works :-) It was the old message, so 1W was not correct any more. Just restarted the system, back in a few minutes. 73, Stefan Am 29.11.2012 19:31, schrieb SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios: > 1819 10 -16 0.0 1420.15 0 DK7FC JN49 1W > 73, Spiros, SV8CS