Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2336B3800008D; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 12:39:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TcgAU-0005vB-P9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:38:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TcgAU-0005v2-9p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:38:58 +0000 Received: from mout1.freenet.de ([195.4.92.91]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TcgAS-00063h-Jh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:38:57 +0000 Received: from [195.4.92.142] (helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TcgA5-0002TP-T7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:38:33 +0100 Received: from localhost ([::1]:39430 helo=mjail2.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1TcgA5-0001fy-Mr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:38:33 +0100 Received: from [195.4.92.14] (port=60317 helo=4.mx.freenet.de) by mjail2.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1Tcg7d-0000vZ-Cc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:36:01 +0100 Received: from blfd-4db00f44.pool.mediaways.net ([77.176.15.68]:2456 helo=[192.168.178.22]) by 4.mx.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (port 465) (Exim 4.76 #1) id 1Tcg7d-0004KY-8G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:36:01 +0100 Message-ID: <50B25700.6050502@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:36:00 +0100 From: wolf_dl4yhf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50B24A55.3050306@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <50B24A55.3050306@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 25.11.2012 17:41, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > MF, > > SM6BGP is running a QRSS-3 BEACON at 472.2 kHz. Mal, what do you think > about that? ;-) > Similar as I do, even though I don't always agree with Mal. Don't we have enough (commercial) MF beacons ? Why not move our own beacons to the upper end of the band, in the vincinity of the other beacons, and closer the QRSS / digimode area where beaconing doesn't cause so much hassle as near the 'CW frequency', where most CW receivers are "parking in idle" ? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [195.4.92.91 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dl4yhf[at]freenet.de) -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4ead635eadbaebfaa92cfec77deb715d Subject: Re: LF: SM6BGP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404e50b257e56bcb X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Am 25.11.2012 17:41, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > MF, > > SM6BGP is running a QRSS-3 BEACON at 472.2 kHz. Mal, what do you think > about that? ;-) > Similar as I do, even though I don't always agree with Mal. Don't we have enough (commercial) MF beacons ? Why not move our own beacons to the upper end of the band, in the vincinity of the other beacons, and closer the QRSS / digimode area where beaconing doesn't cause so much hassle as near the 'CW frequency', where most CW receivers are "parking in idle" ? 73, Wolf (thinking twice if its worth to try CW around 472.3 kHz tonight.. sigh...)