Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 44E2738000086; Sat, 24 Nov 2012 19:54:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TcQTJ-0001fh-Ku for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:53:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TcQTJ-0001fY-8c for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:53:21 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TcQTH-0003QC-1x for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:53:20 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAP0rHU1027289 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:53:17 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAP0rHDK005894 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:53:17 +0100 Message-ID: <50B16BF8.1040007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:53:12 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8CF97D11C5AE652-1638-E77C@webmail-m030.sysops.aol.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Joe, For example my MF PA is also keying coherently, see the schematic at https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/100W%20475kHz%20PA.png Not difficult :-) 73, GL, Stefan Am 25.11.2012 01:31, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Markus, > > Thank-you for the very helpful information. It seems that achieving > coherence is not at all difficult and a worthwhile project for the > future. > > 73 > Joe [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 59677119386dcf9f1872cb454dc1331d Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA at 20:00 - or not? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40da50b16c2b4faf X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Joe, For example my MF PA is also keying coherently, see the schematic at https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/100W%20475kHz%20PA.png Not difficult :-) 73, GL, Stefan Am 25.11.2012 01:31, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Markus, > > Thank-you for the very helpful information. It seems that achieving > coherence is not at all difficult and a worthwhile project for the > future. > > 73 > Joe