Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D8156380000AD; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:19:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TbdEc-0006rp-2e for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:18:54 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TbdEb-0006rd-Li for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:18:53 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TbdEa-0001gj-02 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:18:52 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qAMKIUfG027852 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:18:31 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAMKIUME023849 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:18:30 +0100 Message-ID: <50AE8891.9000600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:18:25 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50AE3388.6040503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50AE5563.2050300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id qAMKIUfG027852 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 22.11.2012 18:12, schrieb IK1WVQ Mauro: > thanks Stefan for raising the power: > > 1650 10 -27 1.7 1019.93 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK Tnx! > > > At 17.40 22/11/12, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> OK, guess i'll rise the power now so that more distant stations have >> a chance as well. Compared to WSPR i'm blind, i.e. don't know if >> someone is receiving at all... > > Yes, too bad that Joe do not implement simply a slow WSPR sharing the > database .... > should be very useful to know also WHO IS LISTENING (= program > running), not only who received !!! Showing who is active in which mode would be possible. However showing a spot and the path between the 2 stations requires at least the TX stations call in the message. So you cannot write "I have a cat" any more... [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410950ae88d84327 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Am 22.11.2012 18:12, schrieb IK1WVQ Mauro: > thanks Stefan for raising the power: > > 1650 10 -27 1.7 1019.93 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK Tnx! > > > At 17.40 22/11/12, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >> OK, guess i'll rise the power now so that more distant stations have=20 >> a chance as well. Compared to WSPR i'm blind, i.e. don't know if=20 >> someone is receiving at all... > > Yes, too bad that Joe do not implement simply a slow WSPR sharing the=20 > database .... > should be very useful to know also WHO IS LISTENING (=3D program=20 > running), not only who received !!! Showing who is active in which mode would be possible. However showing a=20 spot and the path between the 2 stations requires at least the TX=20 stations call in the message. So you cannot write "I have a cat" any more= ... 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > 73 de Mauro Ik1WVQ > > > >