Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BF50C38000114; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:41:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TbZpH-0005G8-HZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:40:31 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TbZpH-0005Fx-2z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:40:31 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TbZpF-0000nh-GK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:40:29 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qAMGe8tU011374 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:40:08 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAMGe8DK019071 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:40:08 +0100 Message-ID: <50AE5563.2050300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:40:03 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50AE3388.6040503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <50AE3388.6040503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK, guess i'll rise the power now so that more distant stations have a chance as well. Compared to WSPR i'm blind, i.e. don't know if someone is receiving at all... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 22.11.2012 15:15, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > LF!!! > > I'm running some *JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz*. So far we concentrated to > JT9-1...JT9-2, as suggested by Joe. However the program may be very > suitable for serious data mode DX on LF/MF after fixing some bugs. > > I'm running only 5W TX power, later, when the band opens for DX i may > rise the levels by some dB. I do not expect timing of frequency drift > problems from my side. > > Reports apprechiated :-) > > If there is some interest on the TA side, i may run this over the > night as well. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: c6a8ca7629fac3d35507e5a7fd3cbf17 Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030708010701090609030307" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40650ae55a90991 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030708010701090609030307 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id qAMGe8tU011374 OK, guess i'll rise the power now so that more distant stations have a=20 chance as well. Compared to WSPR i'm blind, i.e. don't know if someone=20 is receiving at all... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 22.11.2012 15:15, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: > LF!!! > > I'm running some *JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz*. So far we concentrated to=20 > JT9-1...JT9-2, as suggested by Joe. However the program may be very=20 > suitable for serious data mode DX on LF/MF after fixing some bugs. > > I'm running only 5W TX power, later, when the band opens for DX i may=20 > rise the levels by some dB. I do not expect timing of frequency drift=20 > problems from my side. > > Reports apprechiated :-) > > If there is some interest on the TA side, i may run this over the=20 > night as well. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------030708010701090609030307 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id qAMGe8tU011374 OK, guess i'll rise the power now so that more distant stations have a chance as well. Compared to WSPR i'm blind, i.e. don't know if someone is receiving at all...

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 22.11.2012 15:15, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:
LF!!!

I'm running some JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz. So far we concentrated to JT9-1...JT9-2, as suggested by Joe. However the program may be very suitable for serious data mode DX on LF/MF after fixing some bugs.

I'm running only 5W TX power, later, when the band opens for DX i may rise the levels by some dB. I do not expect timing of frequency drift problems from my side.

Reports apprechiated :-)

If there is some interest on the TA side, i may run this over the night as well.

73, Stefan/DK7FC
--------------030708010701090609030307--