Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 92BAD38000083; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:27:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TawHH-0007Q8-Tb for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:26:47 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TawHH-0007Pz-EJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:26:47 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TawHF-0007OE-6Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 22:26:46 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAKMQgfq008548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:26:43 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAKMQgjL017703 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:26:42 +0100 Message-ID: <50AC039D.7050101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 23:26:37 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Mauro, Oh, good question. A difference of 27 Hz, odd. I have no idea. Other stations, including me, must observe the same. We could do the following test: I move my QRG by 5 Hz and then we will see if the offset is still the same or if it becomes 10 Hz more or less... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: strange "duplication" of DK7FC WSPR spots Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411850ac03de2f08 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Mauro, Oh, good question. A difference of 27 Hz, odd. I have no idea. Other stations, including me, must observe the same. We could do the following test: I move my QRG by 5 Hz and then we will see if the offset is still the same or if it becomes 10 Hz more or less... 73, Stefan Am 20.11.2012 22:58, schrieb IK1WVQ Mauro: > Hi to all, > > I see this strange behaviour of the DK7FC WSPR spots: > > 2136 -24 6.5 0.475614 0 DK7FC JN49 30 > 2136 1 6.5 0.475641 0 DK7FC JN49 30 > 2142 -27 6.5 0.475614 0 DK7FC JN49 30 > 2142 0 6.5 0.475641 0 DK7FC JN49 30 > 2148 -28 6.5 0.475614 0 DK7FC JN49 30 > 2148 -2 6.5 0.475641 0 DK7FC JN49 30 > > > At each time slot I receive 2 spots, one strong (0 dB), and the other > weak (-27dB) .. > > Is this an artifact of my receiver (RACALL 1792, ant. PA0RDT) ??? > > 73 de Mauro IK1WVQ >