Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D7639380000A4; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:21:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TankS-0005n3-JS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:20:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TankS-0005mu-6i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:20:20 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TankQ-0005IP-0M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:20:19 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAKDKG9b013729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:20:17 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAKDKG3D003802 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:20:16 +0100 Message-ID: <50AB838B.8050300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:20:11 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50AB6DB5.7040604@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Giorgio, Could it be used as a VFO as well (with a dial! ;-) )? Did you check its frequency stability? 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4b5b5ebe37a4c4f430f59bc35c1947b0 Subject: Re: LF: miniVNA .Antenna analyzer from 0.1 to 180 MHz spectrum Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d550ab83d50738 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Giorgio, Could it be used as a VFO as well (with a dial! ;-) )? Did you check its frequency stability? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 20.11.2012 13:26, schrieb IZ2JGB: > Hi , > > The mini VNA is a fantastic piece > Of equipment for his price. > > Keep in mind that a comparable > Inseriment in The '90 was in The > Some ten thousand Kdollars price !! > > It is ok for LF since it starts at 100 khz. > > I have used it to test The antenna > At IQ2MI and it worked flawlessy. > > 73, > Giorgio > > Inviato da iPhone > > Il giorno 20/nov/2012, alle ore 12:47, Steinar Aanesland ha scritto: > > >> Hi all, >> >> >> I know this is a bit off topic this, but do some of you knows this >> antenna analyzer? And if so, is it OK for use on LF/MF? >> >> http://www.w4rt.com/Misc/miniVNA.htm >> >> -- >> LA5VNA Steinar >> loc:JO59jq >> Mal and spam filtering: extremely STRONG >> www.opera.no >> >> >> >