Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F3F5C380000A0; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 09:14:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TaS61-0001gG-MF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:13:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TaS61-0001g6-8M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:13:09 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TaS5y-0000DH-0l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:13:08 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAJED0r7002595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:13:01 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAJED02g029448 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:13:00 +0100 Message-ID: <50AA3E67.5050200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:12:55 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50A98729.5000208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <005201cdc652$df1fbef0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <50AA2EB9.3060304@gmail.com> <50AA31D6.1030500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <009e01cdc65a$c49d93b0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> In-Reply-To: <009e01cdc65a$c49d93b0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Jay, Yes it would be interesting to do the same test with JT9-30. This mode must be the most interesting for weaker LF stn to plan to make a first TA decode for example. So far "we" concentrated on < JT9-2, with some exceptions. UA0SNV decoded me in JT9-10 over nearly 6000 km. But this was with some of the older versions. Probably the newer modes perform significantly better. So maybe its worth to do some first slower tests. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1708620d3ce65bee0beaaede7929769a Subject: Re: LF: T/A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408250aa3ed36dcb X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks Jay, Yes it would be interesting to do the same test with JT9-30. This mode must be the most interesting for weaker LF stn to plan to make a first TA decode for example. So far "we" concentrated on < JT9-2, with some exceptions. UA0SNV decoded me in JT9-10 over nearly 6000 km. But this was with some of the older versions. Probably the newer modes perform significantly better. So maybe its worth to do some first slower tests. BTW somehow the LF TA path seems to be problematic in the last weeks or months (relative to the time of the year). I remember it was much easier to leave traces like last night in August or September, even more regularly. Can you confirm this observation? Remember your copy in normal WSPR on 137 kHz in August (if i remember correctly). Another thing that might be interesting for Laurence: I got the information from Yas/JA8SCD that JP1ODJ/JD1 is running a temporary LG grabber at http://www16.ocn.ne.jp/~macoco/JP1ODJ_JD1_grabber.html This is certainly an interesting QTH and Laurence may make that distance. I will try it as well from here, however the solar activity reduces my chances drastically... Anyway, i'll run the TX during the entire possible DL-JA opening. Who knows :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 19.11.2012 14:35, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net: >> I'll continue to run more DFCW than digimodes on LF in the next time. >> Looks more promising and less critical. > > FYI ... ran an interesting test a couple weeks back on 137 kHz during > one of your OP32 runs. Had Argo operating in QRSS30 simultaneously > with Opera. At the time you were decoding well around EU and in TF so > your setup must have been working okay. Even though there were vivid > white traces on Argo for nearly the entire period there was no OP32 > copy. You could have been easily decoded with QRSS20 and perhaps even > QRSS10. > > I'll see if I can find the capture and send it along. > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2