Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CE93338000085; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:12:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TaFtJ-0006Ws-57 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:11:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TaFtI-0006Wj-Md for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:11:12 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TaFtG-0008L7-N8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:11:11 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAJ1BAO4008833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:11:10 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAJ1B9XY029530; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:11:09 +0100 Message-ID: <50A98729.5000208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 02:11:05 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "YV7MAE Maritn A. Echazarreta D." CC: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Martin, LF, There are some traces of my signal on your grabber again. The conds seem to be quite good on our path. It is much worse to locations in the US, due to the solar activity! Also the DCF levels are unexpected high in your plot! Thanks for running the grabber so regularly even if there is not so much activity... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 925300287489a1d7272e62b121c112aa Subject: LF: Traces on the YV-grabber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da60a50a987610485 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Martin, LF, There are some traces of my signal on your grabber again. The conds seem to be quite good on our path. It is much worse to locations in the US, due to the solar activity! Also the DCF levels are unexpected high in your plot! Thanks for running the grabber so regularly even if there is not so much activity... 73, Stefan/DK7FC http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html