Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2D30B3800008C; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 13:03:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZmir-0004YT-RM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:02:29 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZmir-0004YK-AB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:02:29 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZmip-0002ii-JA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 18:02:28 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAHI2QA0024858 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 19:02:26 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAHI2QLp021589 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 19:02:26 +0100 Message-ID: <50A7D12D.7060309@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 19:02:21 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Laurence, Just came back to the PC for the first time this day. Well, is the good trans-polar situation still valid? I would then switch to slower modes, either JT9-30 or maybe better DFCW-90. What do you think? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 0317e2ac8ed27149e57223a21580246d Subject: Re: LF: over the pole Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050305060903090908040409" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404b50a7d17c76ff X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050305060903090908040409 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence, Just came back to the PC for the first time this day. Well, is the good trans-polar situation still valid? I would then switch to slower modes, either JT9-30 or maybe better DFCW-90. What do you think? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 17.11.2012 04:32, schrieb Laurence KL1 X: > dcf39 and hga22 coming in well this evening - looking on the 136,172 > window and jt9-2 dial 474,2 > > Laurence kl1 x --------------050305060903090908040409 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence,

Just came back to the PC for the first time this day. Well, is the good trans-polar situation still valid?
I would then switch to slower modes, either JT9-30 or maybe better DFCW-90.

What do you think?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 17.11.2012 04:32, schrieb Laurence KL1 X:
dcf39 and hga22 coming in well this evening - looking on the 136,172 window and jt9-2 dial 474,2

Laurence kl1 x
--------------050305060903090908040409--