Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5817538000097; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 06:54:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZgxl-0003Ix-EP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 11:53:29 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZgxk-0003Io-NB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 11:53:28 +0000 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZgxj-0001RA-0f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 11:53:27 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0MDM00M3ZRP1NCB0@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:53:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.48.212.1]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTPA id <0MDM00JSKRP0B0I0@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:53:25 +0100 (CET) Message-id: <50A77AB4.1050206@broadpark.no> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 12:53:24 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, "*rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk" References: <508D92BE.2040500@broadpark.no> <508ED047.1000504@broadpark.no> <508EEDA9.7070905@princeton.edu> <50901CB0.2040405@princeton.edu> <50917D09.2030908@princeton.edu> <509299E8.7010608@princeton.edu> <5092D947.1000801@princeton.edu> <50998568.2050205@princeton.edu> <50A3EB77.6070108@princeton.edu> <50A69CC5.4090200@princeton.edu> <50A6DB87.3050108@broadpark.no> <50A6DFD8.9010709@princeton.edu> In-reply-to: <50A6DFD8.9010709@princeton.edu> X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Joe, thanks for your quick reply LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: extremely STRONG www.opera.no Den 17.11.2012 01:52, skrev Joe Taylor: > Hi Steinar, > >> Is "Deepest" the same mechanism as in JT65 "Aggressive deep search" ? > > No. The decode levels in JT9 determine a parameter that sets a "timeout > limit" for the sequential (Fano-algorithm) decoder. > > -- Joe > > > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] WSJT-X v0.4 r2746 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608d50a77b084887 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Joe, thanks for your quick reply LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: extremely STRONG www.opera.no Den 17.11.2012 01:52, skrev Joe Taylor: > Hi Steinar, > >> Is "Deepest" the same mechanism as in JT65 "Aggressive deep search" ? > > No. The decode levels in JT9 determine a parameter that sets a "timeout > limit" for the sequential (Fano-algorithm) decoder. > > -- Joe > > >