Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BE23C380000AD; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:53:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZWeL-0002Yw-MD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 00:52:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZWeL-0002Yn-0T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 00:52:45 +0000 Received: from ppa03.princeton.edu ([128.112.128.214]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZWeI-0006yF-MJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 00:52:43 +0000 Received: from csgsmtp201l.Princeton.EDU (csgsmtp201l.Princeton.EDU [128.112.134.60]) by ppa03.princeton.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAH0qfc0005853 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:52:41 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-96-235-189-92.cmdnnj.fios.verizon.net [96.235.189.92] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by csgsmtp201l.Princeton.EDU (8.13.8/8.12.9) with ESMTP id qAH0qeNj023982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:52:41 -0500 Message-ID: <50A6DFD8.9010709@princeton.edu> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:52:40 -0500 From: Joe Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508D92BE.2040500@broadpark.no> <508ED047.1000504@broadpark.no> <508EEDA9.7070905@princeton.edu> <50901CB0.2040405@princeton.edu> <50917D09.2030908@princeton.edu> <509299E8.7010608@princeton.edu> <5092D947.1000801@princeton.edu> <50998568.2050205@princeton.edu> <50A3EB77.6070108@princeton.edu> <50A69CC5.4090200@princeton.edu> <50A6DB87.3050108@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <50A6DB87.3050108@broadpark.no> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8185,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-11-16_08:2012-11-15,2012-11-16,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=quarantine_notspam policy=quarantine score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1211160310 X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steinar, > Is "Deepest" the same mechanism as in JT65 "Aggressive deep search" ? No. The decode levels in JT9 determine a parameter that sets a "timeout limit" for the sequential (Fano-algorithm) decoder. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [128.112.128.214 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: ddae800c6581715278ab3184b42d46db Subject: Re: LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] WSJT-X v0.4 r2746 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d411650a6e019506c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Steinar, > Is "Deepest" the same mechanism as in JT65 "Aggressive deep search" ? No. The decode levels in JT9 determine a parameter that sets a "timeout limit" for the sequential (Fano-algorithm) decoder. -- Joe