Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 887C8380000A1; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:41:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZPmm-0007bV-56 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:33:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZPml-0007bM-Ov for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:32:59 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZPmk-0004tR-7Y for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:32:58 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qAGHWvGA020624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:32:57 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAGHWvc8023200 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:32:57 +0100 Message-ID: <50A678C4.9000507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:32:52 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id qAGHWvGA020624 X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK Joe, Maybe it works later in the night in CW, if the QRN is lower. Maybe 6 dB SNR were missed to read your sigs. Let's try again soon! Maybe this night? 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5c1f37c04fc013ebbc2288fd3791d043 Subject: Re: LF: Testing JT9-2 on 474KHz dial + 1440Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8b50a67ab118f1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none OK Joe, Maybe it works later in the night in CW, if the QRN is lower. Maybe 6 dB=20 SNR were missed to read your sigs. Let's try again soon! Maybe this night= ? 73, Stefan Am 16.11.2012 18:26, schrieb Joe DF2JP: > Hi Stefan, > sorry I was out again. Tnx for the reports. > No sorry, not at the moment, need to replace the loading coil but it=B4= s to > dark now. > Will try to qso with Marco, DD7PC later this evening. > > Btw, yes it was me yesterday in CW but there was a very deep qsb you we= re > peaking 559. I=B4m to weak for CW, output is abt. 40 watts. > > 73 Joe >