Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 56863380000AD; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:03:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZ1u2-0001Zk-NW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:02:54 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZ1u2-0001Zb-B6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:02:54 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ1u0-0006No-Pm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:02:53 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qAFG2pYG020348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:02:51 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qAFG2pFV021363 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:02:51 +0100 Message-ID: <50A51226.4060604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 17:02:46 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50A50E53.6070909@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <50A50E53.6070909@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Eddie, I'm also running Win XP SP3 but there has been no crash of the program so far (latest version). However i still haven't had a chance to decode a signal, nobody is transmitting on LF... 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 0b2d339ae1d48966556dfb6ad64e2bce Subject: Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408450a5126865d1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Eddie, I'm also running Win XP SP3 but there has been no crash of the program so far (latest version). However i still haven't had a chance to decode a signal, nobody is transmitting on LF... 73, Stefan Am 15.11.2012 16:46, schrieb g3zjo: > LF / JO > > v0.4 crashes for me on two diverse machines both running Win XP SP3. > It may be related to de-coding or could be just random crashes. > If it is the first run of a new installation that crashes then the Set > Up parameters are not saved. I cant be any more specific or helpful > than that sorry. > > Eddie G3ZJO