Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 76A9338000098; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 10:26:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZ1K0-0001CB-Ib for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:25:40 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZ1Jz-0001C2-Ut for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:25:39 +0000 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ1Jx-000671-Lk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:25:38 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2012 15:25:35 -0000 Received: from p5B260375.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [127.0.0.1]) [91.38.3.117] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 15 Nov 2012 16:25:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #136974488 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/U3fUfWlfU+ZT2hVJsVIq96KBoM2qVaHi5uzxk2O OhfENVx70WY/bH Message-ID: <50A50963.70307@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:25:23 +0100 From: Tobias DG3LV User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50A39DC2.6050703@psk31.plus.com> <50A39E57.3070006@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <50A39E57.3070006@psk31.plus.com> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Eddie ! Those files, that do not decode directly in WSJT-X, could be decoded if replayed with a (round about) -1 second timeshift. Using the "audacity"-program as a (time-shifted-) tone source WSJT-X (rev 2717) did decode 1244, 1248, 1252 files correctly : 1340 10 18 -0.3 1408.93 0.00 G3ZJO TEST (UTC is time of replay) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.165.64.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dg3lv[at]gmx.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1708620d3ce65bee0beaaede7929769a Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: JT9-2 failed now JT9-1 500khz + 1400hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408650a509b8260d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Eddie ! Those files, that do not decode directly in WSJT-X, could be decoded if replayed with a (round about) -1 second timeshift. Using the "audacity"-program as a (time-shifted-) tone source WSJT-X (rev 2717) did decode 1244, 1248, 1252 files correctly : 1340 10 18 -0.3 1408.93 0.00 G3ZJO TEST (UTC is time of replay) (Files 1246 and 1250 were almost "silence", i.e. no JT9 tones.) The JT9-tones start at : 1244: 1.096 sec 1248: 1.080 sec 1252: 1.142 sec after the begin of the file. Maybe this helps locating the problem. 73 de dg3lv Tobias Am 14.11.2012 14:36, schrieb g3zjo: > > The usual happened to my local de-codes 6 or 7 transmit periods and they > fail to de-code. > > Transmitter drift is noted as less than 0.75Hz in a 4minute RX - TX > period. After 7 decodes they failed, I assume the drift becomes more > rapid than the tolerance level over time. > > The files are, 3 before 2 after de-code fail :- > > https://www.sugarsync.com/pf/D0881137_61669144_98927 > https://www.sugarsync.com/pf/D0881137_61669144_98929 > https://www.sugarsync.com/pf/D0881137_61669144_98921 > https://www.sugarsync.com/pf/D0881137_61669144_98923 > https://www.sugarsync.com/pf/D0881137_61669144_98066 > > Eddie > > >