Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8C5C638000097; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 04:51:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TYw5e-0000KD-0a for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:50:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TYw5d-0000K4-FZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:50:29 +0000 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TYw5a-0004Y4-D8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:50:28 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsIBAA2rpFBcGSxu/2dsb2JhbAANN7EPk1ECgg0BAQEBAycREQU7CwcCCwQJFggHCQMCAQIBHxQBERMCBAEBAQEOCwSHWAMaqDyJbwOJXowxhiwDlXyJSIlqgWQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,255,1352073600"; d="scan'208";a="53861870" Received: from host-92-25-44-110.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([92.25.44.110]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2012 09:50:25 +0000 Message-ID: <50A4BAE7.7050206@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:50:31 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50A40978.1060007@npton.plus.com> <50A409F0.9040609@psk31.plus.com>,<50A416C5.9050400@kpnmail.nl> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB569BA@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be>,<50A4229A.3030802@psk31.plus.com> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB56B07@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB56B07@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Rik Yes sure. Let me know your best time for this evening either here or on AJAX. I have just run JT9-2 to see if v4 still gives me only 6-7 decodes, it does. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: e51657317b06d9cbe905ec682fad6602 Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Now running 500khz + 1400 JT9-1 ver4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608a50a4bb19096e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Rik Yes sure. Let me know your best time for this evening either here or on AJAX. I have just run JT9-2 to see if v4 still gives me only 6-7 decodes, it does. Running JT9-1 now, when the rig is hot and stabilized I will try JT9-2 again. Also testing to see if I get a crash of v.04. As it crashed during first use last night and lost its set up data I wonder do we need to close and re-start before the first use after instal. 73 Eddie On 15/11/2012 08:57, Rik Strobbe wrote: > Hello Eddy, > > could you run another JT9-1 transmission this evening for an hour or so? > This would allow me to collect a number of wav files and compare v0.3 and v0.4 with these. > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens g3zjo [g3zjo@psk31.plus.com] > Verzonden: donderdag 15 november 2012 0:00 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: Re: LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Now running 500khz + 1400 JT9-1 ver4 > > Thanks Rik > > That is interesting -9dB on v0.4 and -28db on v0.3 for the same .wav, it > would be interesting to see Joe's comment. > I will continue for another 30mins. > > Eddie > > On 14/11/2012 22:30, Rik Strobbe wrote: >> Eddie, Jan, >> >> I got decodes from Eddie at 21:56 (-27dB), 21:58 (-28dB), 22:14 (-27dB) and 22:16 (-22dB). All using v0.3. >> After installing v0.4 I ran the 21:58 wav in this version: it decoded at -9dB. Very high number? >> I have v0.4 running now (22:30UTC), let's see what it decodes. >> >> 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T >> >> ________________________________________ >> Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens pa3abk [pa3abk@kpnmail.nl] >> Verzonden: woensdag 14 november 2012 23:10 >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Onderwerp: Re: LF: Fwd: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Now running 500khz + 1400 JT9-1 ver4 >> >> Eddie, >> >> It's difficult to tell whether their is an improvement. >> Figs seems slightly better. (Using V4) >> Meanwhile heavy QRN came up here peaking 9+20. >> Your signal showed a slow QSB over the last 40min. >> At 2126utc you disappeared in the noise and after that slowly increasing >> with a peak at 2146utc >> This is a visual observation in SL. >> >> The figures: >> 2048 1 -24 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2058 10 -6 0.3 1406. 0.0 CQ OR7T JO20 >> 2100 10 -8 0.2 1406. 0.0 CQ OR7T JO20 >> 2104 3 -25 0.3 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2118 4 -25 0.1 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2120 3 -21 0.2 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2122 3 -21 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2132 3 -24 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2134 1 -22 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2136 2 -23 0.2 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2138 4 -25 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2140 4 -21 0.1 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2142 5 -22 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2144 9 -17 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2146 2 -18 0.1 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2148 8 -19 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2150 6 -20 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2154 8 -21 0.2 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2156 7 -22 0.2 1416. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> 2158 3 -21 0.1 1417. 0.0 G3ZJO TEST >> >> 73's >> Jan >> >> >> >> >> >> On 14-11-2012 22:15, g3zjo wrote: >>> Some fairly consistent de-codes sent direct from PA3ABK best S/N -23dB >>> using Ver3. >>> >>> I would be*very* pleased with one de-code from you Mauro. >>> >>> Eddie >>> >>> On 14/11/2012 20:57, IK1WVQ Mauro wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> I am receiving @ 500KHz JT9-1 and OP4 and OP8 .. >>>> No decodes for now... >>>> >>>> 73 de Mauro IK1WVQ JN44CB >>>> >>>> >>>> At 21.06 14/11/12, you wrote: >>>>> First local de-code FB. >>>>> >>>>> Reports welcome of course. >>>>> >>>>> Eddie >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nessun virus nel messaggio in arrivo. >>>>> Controllato da AVG - www.avg.com >>>>> Versione: 9.0.930 / Database dei virus: 2441.1.1/5394 - Data di >>>>> rilascio: 11/14/12 08:34:00 >>>> __._,_.___ >>>> >>>> >>>> Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional >>>> Change settings via the Web >>>> >>>> (Yahoo! ID required) >>>> Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest >>>> >>>> | Switch to Fully Featured >>>> >>>> >>>> Visit Your Group >>>> >>>> | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use >>>> | Unsubscribe >>>> >>>> >>>> __,_._,___ >>>> >>>> No virus found in this message. >>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5394 - Release Date: 11/14/12 >>>> >> -- >> pa3abk<-> dordrecht jo21it >> >> >> ----- >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5394 - Release Date: 11/14/12 >> >> >> > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5395 - Release Date: 11/14/12 > > >