Message-ID: <50A41A18.6000900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:24:24 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <50A3F38E.600@princeton.edu>
In-Reply-To: <50A3F38E.600@princeton.edu>
Subject: Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.4 r2731
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Hello Joe,

Thanks for the improvements.

LF,

I'm monitoring in JT9-1 at 137.5 kHz +- 50 Hz now, during the night.  
Does someone like to do a test transmission? I could interrupt my WSPR 
transmissions and answer in JT9-1 if something is decoded.

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 14.11.2012 20:39, schrieb Joe Taylor:
> To:   Users of WSJT-X
> From: Joe Taylor, K1JT
>
> The installation file for WSJT-X version 0.4, revision 2731 has been 
> posted at
>
> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJTX_04r2731.exe
>
> In this revision a number of known bugs have been fixed, and the JT9 
> decoder is significantly improved.  Among other improvements, the 
> program is now much less fussy about timing issues.
>
> My "To Do" list for WSJT-X is far from empty -- for example, many 
> user-convenience features are yet to be implemented.  However, in its 
> present state WSJT-X performs well and will enable you to make QSOs at 
> signal levels down to those specified on the last page of the User's 
> Guide:
> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJT-X_Quick_Start_Guide.pdf
>
>
> In some circumstances the present decoder will seem slow.  Speed 
> enhancements are yet to come.  In the meantime, you will find it best 
> to set "Tol" (the frequency tolerance parameter) to a value only a few 
> times the width of the desired JT9 signal.
>
> I have now made many QSOs with JT9-1 on 160 m, often with inaudible 
> signals.  I look forward to working you on that band soon!  I also 
> hope to have good receiving systems soon for 137 and 472/500 kHz: 
> maybe we can work cross-band?  A number of us have been coordinating 
> our activity on the K3UK Sked Page: go to
> http://www.obriensweb.com/sked/ and then click on "digitalradio" at 
> the upper right.
>
> As always, your feedback on WSJT-X will be greatly appreciated!  I'll 
> do my best to fix reported bugs quickly.  During this testing period, 
> please remember to run the program with "Save All" checked, and send 
> me examples of *.wav files on which the decoder behaves poorly.
>
>     -- 73, Joe, K1JT