Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 92E3E38000097; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:33:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TYc8O-0005DK-SE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:32:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TYc8O-0005DB-GS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:32:00 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TYc8M-0004Tf-PG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:31:59 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao4DACyOo1BOlnj2/2dsb2JhbAANN444s30BAwEDhCcBAQQ4URQYFg8JAwIBAgE7ChMIAQGvOJNVjzKDJwOVfJMy X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,250,1352073600"; d="scan'208";a="409451052" Received: from host-78-150-120-246.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([78.150.120.246]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2012 12:31:52 +0000 Message-ID: <50A38F37.2080806@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:31:51 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50A38ED3.7010805@npton.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <50A38ED3.7010805@npton.plus.com> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <50A38ED3.7010805@npton.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Testing JT9-2 now for a period until local de-codes stop. Then to JT9-1. My problem is never with timing I think but slight frequency drift with JT9-2 which when Joe adds some tracking should be much better. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 9769dc1fd6241281ce50b20c60b79e34 Subject: LF: Fwd: Testing JT2 500KHz dial + 1400Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b9850a38f9b21c3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Testing JT9-2 now for a period until local de-codes stop. Then to JT9-1. My problem is never with timing I think but slight frequency drift with JT9-2 which when Joe adds some tracking should be much better. Eddie