Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 39CFE3800009F; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:29:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TYN5c-0003xS-Os for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:28:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TYN5a-0003xI-Jh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:28:06 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TYN5Y-00008J-U2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:28:05 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qADKS3P8032453 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:28:03 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qADKS3O7004894 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:28:03 +0100 Message-ID: <50A2AD4E.8090606@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:27:58 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50A2A1B3.5050204@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <50A2A1B3.5050204@broadpark.no> X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ...and i'm now calling on 472.3 kHz. When looking into the DX-cluster it seems i've missed OK2BVG... Just started, will try for at least 30 minutes, giving RX-stns a chance. 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 59677119386dcf9f1872cb454dc1331d Subject: Re: LF: Calling CQ on 472.800 in CW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600c50a2ada551a4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ...and i'm now calling on 472.3 kHz. When looking into the DX-cluster it seems i've missed OK2BVG... Just started, will try for at least 30 minutes, giving RX-stns a chance. 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: Are you receiving with the PC as well? Am 13.11.2012 20:38, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: > Well, I am using a computer so it is probably not the real ting.. > > > >