Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1ACEF3800008F; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:22:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TXgqC-0004xc-HX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 23:21:24 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TXgqC-0004xT-58 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 23:21:24 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TXgqA-0001i9-KX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 23:21:23 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qABNLLTV014908 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:21:21 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qABNLLSt009321 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:21:21 +0100 Message-ID: <50A032EC.2010501@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:21:16 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: George, At 22:48 UTC i can see some traces on the right QRG, which could be my signal. However it is to weak to be valid, in my view. Are your settings optimal, i.e. NB, band filter and so on? 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: LF: 137kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408e50a0333930dd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none George, At 22:48 UTC i can see some traces on the right QRG, which could be my signal. However it is to weak to be valid, in my view. Are your settings optimal, i.e. NB, band filter and so on? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 11.11.2012 19:28, schrieb George Szymanski: > > Conditions seem good at the moment, 1830z. > > I'm seeing DCF39 and HGA22 on SL, both good speaker copy also, some > deep qsb at times though. > > Hope to see some Eu signals overnight if anyone is qrv. > > Time now for some shut eye, it's 0230L. > 73 de George, DU1GM > >