Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4B68E38000240; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:23:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TWD45-0007Yd-MT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:21:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TWD44-0007YU-US for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:21:36 +0000 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TWD43-0001Kg-8q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 21:21:35 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0MD4000PHZBXH330@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:21:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.48.212.1]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTPA id <0MD4005B7ZBWSSY0@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:21:33 +0100 (CET) Message-id: <509AD0DC.1040703@broadpark.no> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:21:32 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 To: "*rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" References: <509AD0C1.9080506@broadpark.no> In-reply-to: <509AD0C1.9080506@broadpark.no> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <509AD0C1.9080506@broadpark.no> X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all Is there now a de facto standard frequency segment to use for JT9 on MF ? - LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: STRONG www.opera.no [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 4d4a9e8f68fb15c54898568240f542c5 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: LF: Frequency for JT9 activity on MF X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d7509ad13f1900 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi all Is there now a de facto standard frequency segment to use for JT9 on MF ? - LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: STRONG www.opera.no