Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 271B3380002B7; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 18:43:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TVsnA-0004E3-2G for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:42:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TVsn9-0004Du-Db for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:42:47 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TVsn7-0004iG-4g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 23:42:46 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA6NgiGv009717 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 00:42:44 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qA6Ngipg026634 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 00:42:44 +0100 Message-ID: <5099A06C.4080500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 00:42:36 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002901cdbc3e$193684d0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <1352239007.87220.YahooMailNeo@web133201.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 07.11.2012 00:28, schrieb Graham: > [...] > It all stems from the race to dB's , as you can see now Gus > has a decode at -20 dB across the pond , where Stefan, just a > new boy to 500 has only -23 dB , but I know Gus was > building a new washing machine size PA over the summer , looks > like its running on Half load ;--) WHAT? ;-) [...] Content analysis details: (-2.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: a3a1dfa33e290fbc5bf9437ae2cb4207 Subject: Re: LF: TRANSVERTERS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090206080507010401040205" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1465099a0b114e5 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090206080507010401040205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Am 07.11.2012 00:28, schrieb Graham: > [...] > It all stems from the race to dB's , as you can see now Gus > has a decode at -20 dB across the pond , where Stefan, just a > new boy to 500 has only -23 dB , but I know Gus was > building a new washing machine size PA over the summer , looks > like its running on Half load ;--) WHAT? ;-) Only -23? So far this is the TA result of Gus and me: Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az 2012-11-06 23:34 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -16 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 23:26 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -23 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 23:24 DK7FC 0.475761 -26 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 2012-11-06 23:22 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -21 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 23:18 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -24 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 23:12 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -20 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 23:06 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -23 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 23:02 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -22 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 22:56 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -25 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 22:30 DK7FC 0.475761 -27 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 2012-11-06 22:24 DK7FC 0.475761 -24 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 2012-11-06 22:12 DK7FC 0.475761 -25 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 2012-11-06 22:06 DK7FC 0.475761 -25 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 2012-11-06 22:06 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -28 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 22:00 DK7FC 0.475761 -23 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 2012-11-06 22:00 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -22 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 21:56 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -21 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 21:54 DK7FC 0.475761 -23 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 2012-11-06 21:48 DK7FC 0.475761 -26 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 2012-11-06 21:20 SM6BHZ 0.475699 -30 0 JO57wq 0.5 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5768 291 2012-11-06 21:06 DK7FC 0.475761 -25 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 2012-11-06 20:54 DK7FC 0.475761 -27 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 2012-11-06 20:48 DK7FC 0.475761 -26 0 JN49ik 1 WD2XSH/17 FN42pb 5927 294 Oh damn, yes indeed, it appears i am weaker. No, just kidding, its no problem :-) Or do you think i should add 10 dB or so? Looks at his favourable QTH! And look to my small PA, running 50W, supplied by an old modified 12V PC SMPS: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/DK7FC%20472%20kHz%20PA%2015W%2B100W.JPG It's all a great fun again tonite! I have to prepare a presentation about VLF / 8970 Hz which i have to hold tomorrow in the evening on our club meeting. But i would like to stare on the WSPR map instead!... 73, Stefan/DK7FC --------------090206080507010401040205 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Am 07.11.2012 00:28, schrieb Graham:
[...]
It all  stems  from the  race  to  dB's  , as you  can see  now  Gus  has  a decode  at  -20 dB  across  the  pond , where  Stefan, just a  new  boy to 500   has only  -23  dB  , but  I know  Gus  was  building  a new  washing  machine  size  PA  over the  summer , looks  like its  running  on  Half load  ;--)
WHAT? ;-)

Only -23?

So far this is the TA result of Gus and me:

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az
 2012-11-06 23:34   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -16   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 23:26   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -23   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 23:24   DK7FC   0.475761   -26   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 
 2012-11-06 23:22   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -21   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 23:18   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -24   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 23:12   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -20   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 23:06   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -23   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 23:02   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -22   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 22:56   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -25   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 22:30   DK7FC   0.475761   -27   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 
 2012-11-06 22:24   DK7FC   0.475761   -24   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 
 2012-11-06 22:12   DK7FC   0.475761   -25   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 
 2012-11-06 22:06   DK7FC   0.475761   -25   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 
 2012-11-06 22:06   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -28   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 22:00   DK7FC   0.475761   -23   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 
 2012-11-06 22:00   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -22   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 21:56   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -21   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 21:54   DK7FC   0.475761   -23   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 
 2012-11-06 21:48   DK7FC   0.475761   -26   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 
 2012-11-06 21:20   SM6BHZ   0.475699   -30   0   JO57wq   0.5   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5768   291 
 2012-11-06 21:06   DK7FC   0.475761   -25   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 
 2012-11-06 20:54   DK7FC   0.475761   -27   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 
 2012-11-06 20:48   DK7FC   0.475761   -26   0   JN49ik   1   WD2XSH/17   FN42pb   5927   294 


Oh damn, yes indeed, it appears i am weaker. No, just kidding, its no problem :-) Or do you think i should add 10 dB or so?
Looks at his favourable QTH! And look to my small PA, running 50W, supplied by an old modified 12V PC SMPS: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/MF/DK7FC%20472%20kHz%20PA%2015W%2B100W.JPG

It's all a great fun again tonite!

I have to prepare a presentation about VLF / 8970 Hz which i have to hold tomorrow in the evening on our club meeting. But i would like to stare on the WSPR map instead!...


73, Stefan/DK7FC


--------------090206080507010401040205--