Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2C74338000146; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:57:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TVQv5-0003WG-IF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:57:07 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TVQv5-0003W5-36 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:57:07 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TVQv3-0006AT-D9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:57:05 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qA5Hv4AI021756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:57:04 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qA5Hv4jd010994 for ; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:57:04 +0100 Message-ID: <5097FDE9.3000000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:56:57 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Laurence, Condx are EXCELLENT on LF/MF. Do you see real chance for our path this night? If so, which mode would be preferred? And are you RXing or TXing at all? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: e4d79cc1e5beb0f7c63f6aa3ce129e10 Subject: Re: LF: JT9-30 drfit Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000103020706060801030003" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4055097fe22045b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000103020706060801030003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence, Condx are EXCELLENT on LF/MF. Do you see real chance for our path this night? If so, which mode would be preferred? And are you RXing or TXing at all? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 05.11.2012 18:09, schrieb Laurence KL1 X: > >From WE2XPQ KL1 X Alaska > > Chaps/chappesses -Looking at my results here overnight I have just too > much thermal drift with my present driver for the 30 mode - the issue > is my trusty FT817 driver using 5MHz IF that even with a TXCO is...too > drifty. JT9-5 is fine - But hey it may have been pretty on an Argo/SL > screen :-) > > The environment is rather hostile for radios - temps are around 0degC > in the garage even with heat (that I can afford anyway) so from long > off periods the radio cools even internally..I need to being the lot > back in the office/shack - but real estate is rather limited and Im in > deep negotiations with the boss. > > Its fine with the "faster" modes but I have some work to do with the > 850 and other drivers - it was just a stop gap to get me on the air. > Ill dig out the ZL1BPU DDS and continue to work on the 850 external > locked ref oscillator doubler board. > > Ill run JT9-5 for a while today for testing purposes - dial 136, tx > plus 1100Hz (carrier 137.11 appx) - > > Laurence Wasilla Palmer Alaska --------------000103020706060801030003 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence,

Condx are EXCELLENT on LF/MF. Do you see real chance for our path this night? If so, which mode would be preferred? And are you RXing or TXing at all? :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 05.11.2012 18:09, schrieb Laurence KL1 X:
>From WE2XPQ KL1 X Alaska

Chaps/chappesses -Looking at my results here overnight I have just too much thermal drift with my present driver for the 30 mode - the issue is my trusty FT817 driver using 5MHz IF that even with a TXCO is...too drifty. JT9-5 is fine -  But hey it may have been pretty on an Argo/SL screen :-)

The environment is rather hostile for radios - temps are around 0degC in the garage even with heat (that I can afford anyway) so from long off periods the radio cools even internally..I need to being the lot back in the office/shack - but real estate is rather limited and Im in deep negotiations with the boss.

Its fine with the "faster" modes but I have some work to do with the 850 and other drivers - it was just a stop gap to get me on the air. Ill dig out the ZL1BPU DDS and continue to work on the 850 external locked ref oscillator doubler board.

Ill run JT9-5 for a while today for testing purposes - dial 136, tx plus 1100Hz  (carrier 137.11 appx) -

Laurence Wasilla Palmer Alaska
--------------000103020706060801030003--