Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5A7BB38000095; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:47:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TVOst-0002Qh-VK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:46:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TVOst-0002QY-HB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:46:43 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TVOsr-0005X0-JZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:46:42 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qA5FkdfS027492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:46:40 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qA5Fkd87007000; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:46:39 +0100 Message-ID: <5097DF59.7060904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:46:33 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: Joe Taylor References: In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id qA5FkdfS027492 X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Joe and Joe, Thank you for watching! The reports appear at least 10 dB to low, right? Someone from across the pond? I also got a single report from UA0SNV in OO17, 5750 km distance, http://dl.dropbox.com/u/76751319/dk7fc_jt9_10.JPG. But it was only a single decode at -30 dB SNR. I bet i could do it in OP8 as well! So something must still be wrong here... [...] Content analysis details: (-1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: Re: LF: AW: JT-5 for TA DX? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60195097df917d26 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Joe and Joe, Thank you for watching! The reports appear at least 10 dB to low, right? Someone from across the pond? I also got a single report from UA0SNV in=20 OO17, 5750 km distance, http://dl.dropbox.com/u/76751319/dk7fc_jt9_10.JPG. But it was only a single decode at -30 dB SNR. I bet i could do it in=20 OP8 as well! So something must still be wrong here... I will ask him for wav files and about PC time locking... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 05.11.2012 07:59, schrieb Joe: > Hi Stefan, > > Last night decodings in JT9-10 > > 2250 10 -7 0.4 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 2330 10 -10 0.4 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 2340 10 -8 1.3 1436.06 0.00 PA0A JO33 > 0050 10 -4 0.9 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0110 10 -5 0.9 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0130 10 -3 0.9 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0150 10 -6 1.3 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0230 10 -6 0.9 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0310 10 -5 0.9 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0330 10 -4 0.9 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0350 10 -4 0.9 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0410 10 -5 0.9 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0450 10 -5 0.9 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0530 10 -7 0.0 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0550 10 -11 0.4 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > 0610 10 -10 0.4 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK > > 73 Joe > DF2JP > > > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] Im Auftrag von Stefan Sch=E4= fer > Gesendet: Sonntag, 4. November 2012 23:08 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Cc: Vasily Savchenko > Betreff: LF: JT-5 for TA DX? > > LF! > > I loved the MF weekend but now its late and the antenna is resonated to > LF. I will give it a try in JT9-10 now, hoping to finally make a 5000+ > distance on 137 kHz, which was no problem in WSPR-8. > > QRG is 137.44 kHz > > Will someone give it a try? Reports apprechiated. Starting now! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > =20