Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4858C38000088; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 20:50:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TUoPC-00013I-AR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:49:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TUoPB-000139-TH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:49:37 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TUoP9-0006QD-Mf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2012 00:49:36 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA40nYCq030337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 01:49:35 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qA40nYXJ013512 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 01:49:34 +0100 Message-ID: <5095BB99.10707@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 01:49:29 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <00a701cdb9f4$3da16ac0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00c301cdb9f5$81dc7fd0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50957826.1020906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8B6DF9B1D2684ACD8ADBD10ABB0002E6@SV8CSHP> <5095879B.6010807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5095B6C7.2070505@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <5095B6C7.2070505@freenet.de> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id qA40nYCq030337 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Wolf, We have some magic experts in the group which can find any relation how the signal could be generated! Just let them spend some minutes to run their brain on that issue :-) Here the trace is gone as well. I can see QRB on the trace, typical for MF. That makes a local origin more unlikely. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: Re: LF: OM1II loud Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d75095bbd74eca X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Wolf, We have some magic experts in the group which can find any relation how=20 the signal could be generated! Just let them spend some minutes to run=20 their brain on that issue :-) Here the trace is gone as well. I can see QRB on the trace, typical for=20 MF. That makes a local origin more unlikely. Yes, i'm interested in the picture. 73, GN, Stefan Am 04.11.2012 01:28, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > > > Am 03.11.2012 22:07, schrieb Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer: >> Lubos, >> >> I can hear OM1II on 472.5 again. But there is the QRM trace which is=20 >> stronger in the evening. I don't think it is local.=20 > > Zigactly. I have that carrier on 472.5 too, since a couple of months,=20 > but these days it's very audible and annoying. I tried to find an ID=20 > (modulation sideband) symmetrically around that carrier, but didn't=20 > find anything related to that frequency. > > The SV beacon was sometimes audible here, and even on Joe's frequency=20 > (504.1 kHz) there was a sometimes audible signal. But suspiciously the=20 > signal was switched off at 23:00 UTC, so I guess it was something=20 > else. The signal looked like a carrier, some seconds long, interrupted=20 > at regular intervals by a CW ID (which I couldn't read by ear). I have=20 > a screenshot of a spectrogram on the 'portable' computer if anyone is=20 > interested. > > > All the best, > Wolf . >