Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 02ACB3800009D; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 17:08:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TUkwb-00073S-I9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:07:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TUkwb-00073J-08 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:07:53 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TUkwZ-0005Fk-Dx for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 21:07:51 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA3L7oJS016237 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 22:07:51 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qA3L7oYL009496 for ; Sat, 3 Nov 2012 22:07:50 +0100 Message-ID: <5095879B.6010807@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 22:07:39 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <00a701cdb9f4$3da16ac0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <00c301cdb9f5$81dc7fd0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <50957826.1020906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <8B6DF9B1D2684ACD8ADBD10ABB0002E6@SV8CSHP> In-Reply-To: <8B6DF9B1D2684ACD8ADBD10ABB0002E6@SV8CSHP> X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Lubos, I can hear OM1II on 472.5 again. But there is the QRM trace which is stronger in the evening. I don't think it is local. So others may have the same problem to copy him with this constant tone in the background.. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: e4383209d2ccb9552700d53c0b540538 Subject: Re: LF: OM1II loud Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14a509587d543ef X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Lubos, I can hear OM1II on 472.5 again. But there is the QRM trace which is stronger in the evening. I don't think it is local. So others may have the same problem to copy him with this constant tone in the background.. Just a hint. 73, Stefan