Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 95E4038000088; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 13:02:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TUKcJ-0007sN-SO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:01:11 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TUKcJ-0007sE-EX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:01:11 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TUKcG-0005uN-Tc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:01:10 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qA2H17Zx024726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 18:01:08 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qA2H17AL008032 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 18:01:07 +0100 Message-ID: <5093FC48.4050009@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 18:00:56 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508D92BE.2040500@broadpark.no> <508ED047.1000504@broadpark.no> <508EEDA9.7070905@princeton.edu> <50901CB0.2040405@princeton.edu> <50917D09.2030908@princeton.edu> <509299E8.7010608@princeton.edu> <5092D947.1000801@princeton.edu> <5093F43C.2060303@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <5093F43C.2060303@otenet.gr> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id qA2H17Zx024726 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Alex, MF, I just heared OM1II calling in CW on 472.5 kHz. Strong signal but strong QSB as well. I'm now calling in CW on 474.3 kHz. There is sporadic local narrow band QRM on 472.5 here... Conds on MF appear to be very promising! [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: d7907c3bf895ca41e0bedc3fa074f0d4 Subject: LF: MF weekend Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad05093fc8e730a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Alex, MF, I just heared OM1II calling in CW on 472.5 kHz. Strong signal but strong=20 QSB as well. I'm now calling in CW on 474.3 kHz. There is sporadic local=20 narrow band QRM on 472.5 here... Conds on MF appear to be very promising! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 02.11.2012 17:26, schrieb Alex Deligiannis: > Hi, > > We just gain an MF allocation in Greece 472-479 kHz, > > I'm QRX on WSJT-X already but I don't know the exact (dial) Frequency.=20 > Can somebody inform for the band plan WSPER OPERA and WSJT-X? > > 73's > Alex KM39gc > > On 1/11/2012 10:19 =CE=BC=CE=BC, Joe Taylor wrote: >> To: Users of WSJT-X >> From: Joe Taylor, K1JT >> >> A new revision of WSJT-X has been posted at >> >> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJTX_02r2713.exe >> >> Changes from r2711 include the following: >> >> 1. Updates to the Quick-Start User's Guide, >> http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJT-X_Users_Guide.pdf >> >> 2. Double-click on waterfall now sets Tol to a reduced=20 >> (mode-dependent) value. >> >> 3. Tol is saved and restored on program restart. >> >> 4. A "digital gain" slider was added next to the green-bar audio=20 >> level indicator. With the slider at mid-range, the scale reads=20 >> correctly in dB above the least significant bit of 16-bit audio data. >> >> 5. There is now a test that rejects at least one type of data that is=20 >> sufficiently corrupt to cause Eddie's best friend, the message=20 >> "15P6715P67WCV". >> >> 6. Several minor tweaks to improve decoder performance. >> >> 7. The program now starts with Monitor OFF. You must click Monitor to=20 >> start accepting audio. For some types of testing, this may be an=20 >> advantage. This startup condition may be changed again, in the future. >> >> Please keep the reports coming, good or bad. With your thorough and=20 >> conscientious reports, WSJT-X and JT9 will be *much* more reliable,=20 >> soon! >> >> -- 73, Joe, K1JT >> >> > >