Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C3166380000B2; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:08:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TUJm8-0007GU-BV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:07:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TUJm7-0007GL-UW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:07:15 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TUJm6-0005a2-2E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:07:14 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA2G7DwA030654 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:07:13 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qA2G7DqK006735 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:07:13 +0100 Message-ID: <5093EFA6.8030907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 17:07:02 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: LF! We are in the LF DX season since a few weeks. When looking to the DCF plot at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html it looks like there are good chances for stronger EU and US LF stns to leave a first trace in South America. However there is not much activity in the EU60 and TA60 slots. Why? Are we really spread out by to many bands and modes? For comparison, see this capture from last year: http://simnet.is/halldorgudmunds/TF3HZ_LFgrabber/Captures/31_12_11LFeight.jpg [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: LF: Venezuela LF grabber Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40845093efe2712d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none LF! We are in the LF DX season since a few weeks. When looking to the DCF plot at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html it looks like there are good chances for stronger EU and US LF stns to leave a first trace in South America. However there is not much activity in the EU60 and TA60 slots. Why? Are we really spread out by to many bands and modes? For comparison, see this capture from last year: http://simnet.is/halldorgudmunds/TF3HZ_LFgrabber/Captures/31_12_11LFeight.jpg 73, GL! Stefan/DK7FC