Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CE3F33800008D; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 07:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TUF4b-0004HR-Je for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:06:01 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TUF4b-0004HI-6j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:06:01 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TUF4Z-0003iU-1D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:06:00 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qA2B5vk7005657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:05:57 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qA2B5vKp027649 for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:05:57 +0100 Message-ID: <5093A90A.1080701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:05:46 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5093004A.2050606@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <5093004A.2050606@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Eddie, Thanks for the report, i will do so in the afternoon. Hopefully it works on my side then, so i'm getting a first decode on the grabber PC. If you like i can send some "15P6715P67WCV "s for you ;-) [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: Re: LF: WSJTX V02 r2713 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600e5093a9546565 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Eddie, Thanks for the report, i will do so in the afternoon. Hopefully it works on my side then, so i'm getting a first decode on the grabber PC. If you like i can send some "15P6715P67WCV "s for you ;-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 02.11.2012 00:05, schrieb g3zjo: > Have installed Vr2713 > Oh what a difference. > Just had a proper QSO with OR7T who was no longer a huge reddish pink > blot on the horizon. Now a reasonable looking trace for a station at > the distance. > > Here is my recommended set up for this version on XP Machines. First > run WSPR2 set the audio levels for 0dB this level is correct for > Spectrum Lab, Fldigi, Slow Scan you name it. > Now open WSJT-X the dB scale will be overloaded pull down the slider > by the side to set the levels as indicated in the quick set up guide. > > Joe, the questions remains. Why do WSJT2.11 and WSJTX have such a > strangely sensitive input. > > What we need now is the same slider or a return to normal Audio > levels for the TX side it is overloaded by the same amount I would say. > > Where are all my "15P6715P67WCV "s missing them already. > > Eddie G3ZJO > >