Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E80EF380000B1; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:49:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTixi-0002wO-Or for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:48:46 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTixi-0002wF-AF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:48:46 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTixg-00012Q-AR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:48:45 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qA10mhEQ007864 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 01:48:43 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id qA10mhVP000582 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 01:48:43 +0100 Message-ID: <5091C6E2.9040509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 01:48:34 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5090EEF7.5040806@xs4all.nl> <418BB03E1F0E4B24936FF0DD26C5AD59@White> <5091BF22.7050808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id qA10mhEQ007864 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: OK Joe but you're still receiving, yes? I would transmit a single OP32 round on 136.515 kHz soon, OK? So far i didn't see you or got a report from you in OP on LF. Or would you prefer OP8? 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 2ee80849a5d572dbc974bb207a527753 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA QSX 136.000K OP32 NOW!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40565091c72b73c8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none OK Joe but you're still receiving, yes? I would transmit a single OP32=20 round on 136.515 kHz soon, OK? So far i didn't see you or got a report from you in OP on LF. Or would you prefer OP8? 73, Stefan Am 01.11.2012 01:40, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Sorry Stefan (and Graham)... My last email should have had a "Hi Stefan= " > salutation! > > Joe VO1NA > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, jcraig@mun.ca wrote: > >> Hi Graham, >> >> Sorry but not QRV on TX. The LF station is dismantled at the moment=20 >> -- a heartbreaking story. The RX is on since >> 2200 utc but nil so far. >> >> 73 >> Joe >> >> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Stefan Sch=EF=BF=BDfer wrote: >> >>> Hello Joe, >>> >>> Are you still QRV in OP32? I would like to try if i can make it to=20 >>> you as well. Give me a short sign please. >>> >>> 73, Stefan >>> >>> Am 31.10.2012 23:45, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>>> Greetings Albert and Markus, >>>> >>>> It was most gratifying to see your call signs on the screen. Thanks >>>> to you both and Graham for the entertainment. >>>> >>>> The RX is on again tonight. >>>> >>>> 73 >>>> Joe VO1NA >>>> >>>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Markus Vester wrote: >>>> >>>>> This came a real surprise for me. Thank you Joe, you've made my=20 >>>>> day! Thanks also to Graham for the announcement and QSP. >>>>> >>>>> Like Albert, I had also sent only a single round of "homemade"=20 >>>>> Opera. So that makes it 100% decodes, 2 out of 2 ;-) Antenna=20 >>>>> current here was 3.8 amps to a (recently recalibrated) effective=20 >>>>> height of 8.5 m, resulting in 0.63W ERP. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps I hadn't really deserved this, after all my critical=20 >>>>> remarks on the mode's sensitivity ;-) >>>>> >>>>> Best 73, >>>>> Markus (DF6NM) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Albert W >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 10:27 AM >>>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >>>>> Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA QSX 136.000K OP32 NOW!! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Joe, >>>>> >>>>> I am very happy with this result, I only made one transmission in=20 >>>>> Op 32 >>>>> @ 136kHz and after that back to WSJT-X on 500 kHz. >>>>> >>>>> 73, Albert PA0A >>>>> >>>>> Op 31-10-2012 10:13, jcraig@mun.ca schreef: >>>>> >>>>> Dear Graham, Group, >>>>> >>>>> There were 2 OP32 receptions last night (yesterday evening): >>>>> 2113 PA0A -38 dB and 2202 DF6NM -36 dB. >>>>> >>>>> 73 >>>>> Joe VO1NA >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and=20 >>>> conditions at >>>> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2= 012.php=20 >>> >>> >> > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions a= t > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2012= .php=20 > >