Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 10B693800010D; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 15:15:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TZ5pH-0002WW-Lh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:14:15 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TZ5pH-0002WM-6a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:14:15 +0000 Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.4]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TZ5pF-0007Y2-Bz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:14:14 +0000 Received: from F6CNIHP (unknown [83.153.241.20]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id C32FA4C81BB for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:14:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3CBCF51D639B4DB6AEEFA744016904D0@F6CNIHP> From: =?iso-8859-1?B?QW5kcukgR3V56Q==?= To: References: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB56BEE@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB56BEE@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 21:14:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3505.912 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3505.912 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121115-0, 15/11/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Rick, Your test is OK here using the V-04 : 2003 10 8 0.1 1406. 0.0 OR7T TEST 2004 0 -1 0.9 1396. 0.0 2005 10 6 0.2 1406. 0.0 OR7T TEST On the way, here I tested JT9 for his begining, several weeks ago, using some PC with Windows 7-64, 8 or XP pro-32. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.27.42.4 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 8ef270cc2ec30cd34b6313d7ada17a45 Subject: Re: LF: JT9-1 test on 500khz + 1400hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01CDC376.24B6F620" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, LINES_OF_YELLING,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d650a54d487976 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Ce message est composé et au format MIME. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CDC376.24B6F620 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Rick, Your test is OK here using the V-04 : 2003 10 8 0.1 1406. 0.0 OR7T TEST =20 2004 0 -1 0.9 1396. 0.0 2005 10 6 0.2 1406. 0.0 OR7T TEST =20 On the way, here I tested JT9 for his begining, several weeks ago, using = some PC with Windows 7-64, 8 or XP pro-32. I had never time any problem to copy using JT-9. Best 73. Andy F6CNI. -----Message d'origine-----=20 From: Rik Strobbe=20 Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:14 PM=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: JT9-1 test on 500khz + 1400hz=20 Dear all, Eddie, G3ZJO, and I are going to have a JT9-1 test this evening between = 20:00 and 21:00 UTC. The goal (at my side) is to compare WSJT-X v0.03 and v0.04. Eddie will transmit the even minutes and I will take the odd minutes. Frequency: 500kHz dial and 1400Hz audio (so 501.4kHz TX frequency). All reports are welcome. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CDC376.24B6F620 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Rick, Your test is OK here using the V-04 :
 
2003  10    8   0.1  =20 1406.   0.0   OR7T=20 TEST           &nb= sp;=20
2004   0   -1   0.9  =20 1396.   0.0
2005  10    6   0.2  =20 1406.   0.0   OR7T=20 TEST           &nb= sp;=20
 
On the way, here I tested JT9 for his begining, several weeks ago, = using=20 some PC with Windows 7-64, 8 or XP pro-32.
 
I had never time any problem to copy = using=20 JT-9.
 
Best 73.
 
Andy F6CNI.
 
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Rik Strobbe
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 8:14 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: JT9-1 test on 500khz + 1400hz
 
Dear all,
 
Eddie, G3ZJO, and I are going to have a JT9-1 test this evening = between=20 20:00 and 21:00 UTC.
The goal (at my side) is to compare WSJT-X v0.03 and v0.04.
Eddie will transmit the even minutes and I will take the odd = minutes.
Frequency: 500kHz dial and 1400Hz audio (so 501.4kHz TX = frequency).
All reports are welcome.
 
73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01CDC376.24B6F620--