Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D3E7D380000B4; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:25:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Te7rC-0005V8-Il for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:25:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Te7rC-0005Uz-37 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:25:02 +0000 Received: from imr-da06.mx.aol.com ([205.188.169.203]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Te7r9-000139-Kv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:25:00 +0000 Received: from mtaout-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.195]) by imr-da06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id qATHOSt0011237 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:24:28 -0500 Received: from White (nrbg-4dbe76aa.pool.mediaWays.net [77.190.118.170]) by mtaout-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id AA538E000082 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 12:24:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3BD64A7C261A4B98BA0FDA8D1B8ED955@White> From: "Markus Vester" To: References: <50B76F28.6040103@princeton.edu> <50B7728C.9050004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <425211790.20121129174759@mterrier.net> <50B7981A.8000804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:24:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 12.0.1606 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V12.0.1606 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1354209868; bh=edLhOGQ87GKU8vYW8Ulh6Db45jbzKc5IcJHv0z8os9Y=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KpJ+3BczDC6x/8EhZ9Wf26Pi1JKNVmP3AUWdop8kxDCdwgtlSA9Ll1IkAfn4Fmfg+ wm9XMAoJukz7GO/PUttPISxNwPFFALVK4qsUUcgOviTueOt4pyy1chXoa7ngXsswrw ZE13ne/no97mAOT/TZ6U8wrreQ4iiBXoKkJb2Gic= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:457539840:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan, yes, theoretically JT9-10 should work down to SNR -37 dB in 2.5 kHz (which would read -41 dB on the Opera scale ;-) Each of your transmissions has been decoded here. Are you receiving JT9 as well? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.169.203 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b4085bc26841e34d79a2f3beb8f287b1 Subject: Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01CDCE5E.C076C7F0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-dk05.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : mx.aol.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40950b79aa2392e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dies ist eine mehrteilige Nachricht im MIME-Format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CDCE5E.C076C7F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan, yes, theoretically JT9-10 should work down to SNR -37 dB in 2.5 kHz = (which would read -41 dB on the Opera scale ;-) Each of your transmissions has been decoded here. Are you receiving JT9 = as well? Best 73, MArkus (DF6NM) From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 6:15 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10 Hi Markus and Michel,=20 Thanks for the reports :-) Hm, what is the lowest possible SNR in = JT9-10? Guess i'm still 6 dB above the limit for Michel. I'll continue at 1W TX pwr until 18 UTC, then QRO to give UA0SNV a = chance. LF propagation looks favourable! 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 29.11.2012 17:47, schrieb Michel Brunel:=20 1619 5 -31 -0.4 1499.92 1 DK7FC JN49 1W=20 1639 6 -29 -0.4 1500.00 1 DK7FC JN49 1W=20 Excellent !! Michel - f5wk -- ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CDCE5E.C076C7F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan,
 
yes, theoretically JT9-10 should work = down to SNR=20 -37 dB in 2.5 kHz (which would read -41 dB on the Opera scale = ;-)
 
Each of your = transmissions has been=20 decoded here. Are you receiving JT9 as well?
 
Best 73,
MArkus (DF6NM)
 

From: Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 6:15 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2786_JT9-10

Hi Markus and=20 Michel,

Thanks for the reports :-) Hm, what is the lowest = possible SNR=20 in JT9-10? Guess i'm still 6 dB above the limit for Michel.

I'll = continue=20 at 1W TX pwr until 18 UTC, then QRO to give UA0SNV a chance. LF=20 propagation looks favourable!

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am = 29.11.2012=20 17:47, schrieb Michel Brunel:=20


1619 5 -31 = -0.4=20 1499.92 1 DK7FC JN49 1W 

1639 6 -29 -0.4 1500.00 1 DK7FC = JN49=20 1W 


Excellent = !!

Michel=20 - f5wk
-- 
------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CDCE5E.C076C7F0--