Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EDA81380000B1; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 11:39:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TbZno-0005ER-Qk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:39:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TbZno-0005EI-AT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:39:00 +0000 Received: from smtp08.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.130] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TbZnm-0000nM-Ou for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:38:59 +0000 Received: from xps.home ([83.112.62.20]) by mwinf5d16 with ME id Sgeb1k00K0SCPR703gedLM; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:38:38 +0100 Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 17:38:34 +0100 From: Michel Brunel X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1238790198.20121122173834@mterrier.net> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <50AE3388.6040503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <50AE3388.6040503@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, 1550 10 20 0.0 1500.42 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 1610 10 19 0.0 1500.42 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 20 db SNR not bad ! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.130 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 77d68ebd44814a6def4d7158b7296e78 Subject: Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----------F72F5C250137A6" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, LINES_OF_YELLING,LINES_OF_YELLING_2,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cc50ae55551d16 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------------F72F5C250137A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, 1550 10 20 0.0 1500.42 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK=20 1610 10 19 0.0 1500.42 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK=20 20 db SNR not bad ! Michel - f5wk Le jeudi 22 novembre 2012 =E0 15:15:36, Stefan =E9crivait : LF!!! I'm running some JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz. So far we concentrated to JT9-1...JT= 9-2, as suggested by Joe. However the program may be very suitable for seri= ous data mode DX on LF/MF after fixing some bugs. I'm running only 5W TX power, later, when the band opens for DX i may rise = the levels by some dB. I do not expect timing of frequency drift problems f= rom my side. Reports apprechiated :-) If there is some interest on the TA side, i may run this over the night as = well. 73, Stefan/DK7FC -- ------------F72F5C250137A6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LF: JT9-10 on 137.42 kHz Hi Stefan,

1550 10 20 0.0 1500.42 0.00= DK7FC JN49IK 
1610 10 19 0.0 1500.42 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 

20 db SNR  not bad !

Michel - f5wk

Le jeudi 22 novembre 2012 =E0 15:15:36, Stefan =E9crivait :


 --  ------------F72F5C250137A6--