Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 68C30380000B4; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:37:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TeSdk-0004Ws-BQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:36:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TeSdj-0004Wj-M2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:36:31 +0000 Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TeSdh-0006Dm-2u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:36:30 +0000 Received: from omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.28]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Vq3W1k00G0cZkys53rc7w0; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:36:07 +0000 Received: from DELL4 ([71.234.119.9]) by omta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Vrc61k00D0CFS1j3Wrc6QL; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:36:06 +0000 Message-ID: <004601cdcf10$6993c250$6d01a8c0@DELL4> From: To: References: <50B76F28.6040103@princeton.edu> <50B7728C.9050004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <425211790.20121129174759@mterrier.net> <50B7981A.8000804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <3BD64A7C261A4B98BA0FDA8D1B8ED955@White> <50B79F99.30706@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50B7A63D.4080205@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50B7A888.2040105@broadpark.no> <50B7AC55.6030004@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <9F1A99AA5B9843E39732D8BBA787F399@SV8CSHP> <50B7B684.1070904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50B7D99B.6000705@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001201cdce89$dd9c6cb0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <50B8B7B5.3090200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:36:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1354289767; bh=m+veKXWgThXOjkxFNW/7cxniKydtLxO7+JFNjzHtfJU=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=F3ZartEc0C2hCswBhxM/Kka2/u/Pt0KOvh9ha3LIrx+8CDUuD8GBXC8ZS3R9Fldem 75rPj2/CiIXOKVgbm2Lc5ouYXl6dQCf6tq5d4z9CDUYbMAbOtP5hhti6oXYmQklES/ l+dGgtQ4KfJUGuO1pnR8uKwscw9iVwQYzE13rTqk2QGBlhtXr9OBlw0szQsROFSBe7 dLVHqekVASWNyjwACLcvYIgPGMYJ87OwRKXERpCaEZgDTWuKi1nLHlY8mBqNTDYMdz 9zAsqMBe+X9SJgoxNXpw0ZSIXWjtOElSBNmuHbiP7AvczHw9MO1s86JPUm7BGDkHl1 8IFn5gjkOD3Yg== X-Spam-Score: 4.3 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Conditions were favorable with DST running -15 nT and static levels about 4 on a 10 scale (1 dead of winter, 10 middle of summer). Signals were in early, dropped down for a few hours and then re-emerged ... which is normal for T/A signals this time of year. Six decodes. Did not run spectrogram. Congrats on 1st 136 kHz JT9 T/A! [...] Content analysis details: (4.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.32 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 3.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: e3d323418d60e0f7f0af176deb9f3e2b Subject: LF: 136 JT9-10 T/A Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0043_01CDCEE6.807D55F0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY,LINES_OF_YELLING,NO_REAL_NAME,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mc05.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : comcast.net DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604d50b8d2b66cf4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0043_01CDCEE6.807D55F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan Conditions were favorable with DST running -15 nT and static levels = about 4 on a 10 scale (1 dead of winter, 10 middle of summer). Signals = were in early, dropped down for a few hours and then re-emerged ... = which is normal for T/A signals this time of year. Six decodes. Did not = run spectrogram. Congrats on 1st 136 kHz JT9 T/A! UTC Date: 2012-Nov-29 2329 3 -34 0.0 1419.83 0 DK7FC JN49IK 4 10 2339 2 -36 0.0 1419.83 0 DK7FC JN49IK 22 10 2349 3 -35 0.4 1419.82 0 DK7FC JN49IK 11 10 UTC Date: 2012-Nov-30=20 0229 2 -35 0.9 1419.87 0 DK7FC JN49IK 60 10 0249 1 -36 0.9 1419.87 0 DK7FC JN49IK 7 10 0319 1 -36 -0.4 1419.88 0 DK7FC JN49IK 5 10 Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Cc: Vasily Savchenko ; Joe Taylor=20 Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 8:42 AM Subject: Re: LF: 136 JT9-10 Hello LF,=20 Thanks to DF6NM, RN3AGC, F5WK, DF2JP, UA0SNV, SV8CS, W1VD, LA5VNA (and = those which i forgot to mention) for the JT9-10 reports on 137.42 kHz!!=20 I guess that was a first TA crossing in JT9 on LF. Jay, did you have = local QRN or was it a quiet night? Did you try to watch the signal in a = spectrogram? How many decodes did you get in the night? Or was it the = only one? 23:30 is normally the time where the band opens between us = these days, so i guess there have been a number of further decodes. = Looking forward to that :-)=20 Would be gain 10*log(30/10) =3D 4.77 dB SNR when going from JT9-10 to = JT9-30, assuming there is no negative effect due to QSB and so on? Would = someone be interested in tests in JT9-30?=20 I guess this evening is reserved to MF CW here but late in the night i = could run some JT9-30 sequences. MF alternatively. There have been further decodes at UA0SNV (5760 km over land): All that I received today. 1949 0 -38 2.2 1419.65 -1 DK7FC JN49IK 2009 3 -35 1.3 1419.62 0 DK7FC JN49IK 2019 2 -36 1.7 1419.56 0 DK7FC JN49IK 2149 5 -32 2.6 1419.65 1 DK7FC JN49IK 2159 3 -34 2.6 1419.65 1 DK7FC JN49IK 73 !! Vasily. Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 30.11.2012 00:32, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net:=20 Bingo=20 2329 3 -34 0.0 1419.83 0 DK7FC JN49IK=20 http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html=20 Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0043_01CDCEE6.807D55F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Stefan
 
Conditions were favorable with DST = running -15 nT=20 and static levels about 4 on a 10 scale (1 dead of winter, 10 = middle of=20 summer). Signals were in early,  dropped down for a few hours and = then=20 re-emerged ... which is normal for T/A signals this time of = year. Six=20 decodes. Did not run spectrogram. Congrats on 1st 136 kHz JT9 = T/A!
 
UTC Date: 2012-Nov-29
 
2329   3  -34   0.0 1419.83  =20 0   DK7FC=20 JN49IK           &= nbsp;    =20 4 10
2339   2  -36   0.0 1419.83   = 0   DK7FC=20 JN49IK           &= nbsp;   =20 22 10
2349   3  -35   0.4 = 1419.82  =20 0   DK7FC=20 JN49IK           &= nbsp;   =20 11 10
UTC Date: 2012-Nov-30

0229   2  -35   0.9 = 1419.87  =20 0   DK7FC=20 JN49IK           &= nbsp;   =20 60 10

0249   1  -36   0.9 = 1419.87  =20 0   DK7FC=20 JN49IK           &= nbsp;    =20 7 10

0319   1  -36  -0.4 1419.88  =20 0   DK7FC=20 JN49IK           &= nbsp;    =20 5 10
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS =20 WE2XGR/2
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Cc: Vasily Savchenko ; Joe = Taylor
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 = 8:42=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: 136 = JT9-10

Hello LF,

Thanks to DF6NM, RN3AGC, F5WK, DF2JP, = UA0SNV,=20 SV8CS, W1VD, LA5VNA (and those which i forgot to mention) for the = JT9-10=20 reports on 137.42 kHz!!

I guess that was a first TA crossing = in JT9 on=20 LF. Jay, did you have local QRN or was it a quiet night? Did you try = to watch=20 the signal in a spectrogram? How many decodes did you get in the = night? Or was=20 it the only one? 23:30 is normally the time where the band opens = between us=20 these days, so i guess there have been a number of further decodes. = Looking=20 forward to that :-)

Would be gain 10*log(30/10) =3D 4.77 dB = SNR when=20 going from JT9-10 to JT9-30, assuming there is no negative effect due = to QSB=20 and so on? Would someone be interested in tests in JT9-30?

I = guess=20 this evening is reserved to MF CW here but late in the night i could = run some=20 JT9-30 sequences. MF alternatively.


There have been further = decodes=20 at UA0SNV (5760 km over land):
All that I received = today.

1949   0 =20 -38   2.2 1419.65  -1   DK7FC=20 JN49IK
2009   3  -35   1.3=20 1419.62   0   DK7FC = JN49IK
2019  =20 2  -36   1.7 1419.56   0   DK7FC=20 JN49IK
2149   5  -32   2.6=20 1419.65   1   DK7FC = JN49IK
2159  =20 3  -34   2.6 1419.65   1   DK7FC=20 JN49IK
73 !! Vasily.

Best 73,=20 Stefan/DK7FC




Am 30.11.2012 00:32, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net:=20
Bingo

2329   3  -34   = 0.0=20 1419.83   0   DK7FC JN49IK

http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.htm= l=20

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2=20



------=_NextPart_000_0043_01CDCEE6.807D55F0--