Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BD5923800008F; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:29:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tchsq-00072z-FH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:28:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tchsp-00072j-OP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:28:51 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tchsn-0006ac-QG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:28:50 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AroTAH1wslBcECYA/2dsb2JhbABEhT+FF7RkA4EDFnOCGQUBAQQBCAEBAyUBJSwBAQMFAgEDDQQEAQEKJRQBBBocCAYTCgECAgEBh2oDCQqzPAyJVYw3QFqDJwONeI4WijeCbw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,316,1352073600"; d="scan'208";a="400878516" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.16.38.0]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 25 Nov 2012 19:28:28 +0000 Message-ID: <002b01cdcb43$0b31e8c0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <50B24A55.3050306@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50B25700.6050502@freenet.de> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 19:28:26 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 4.4 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Wolf es Stefan EVERY0NE agrees with me in the END when they have thought about it !! Some persons are very slow to realise what is going on or too afraid to speak out Beacons are just QRM GENERATORS to those of us who want to have a QSO and often Unattended and a possibe FIRE RISK if you are not there to extinguish a fire if one starts. I personally am always in the shack when Transmitting even though my Loading coils is 30 metres away in a field beside the antenna. [...] Content analysis details: (4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [92.16.38.0 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 3.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: Re: LF: SM6BGP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618950b271994b00 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Wolf es Stefan EVERY0NE agrees with me in the END when they have thought about it !! Some persons are very slow to realise what is going on or too afraid to speak out Beacons are just QRM GENERATORS to those of us who want to have a QSO and often Unattended and a possibe FIRE RISK if you are not there to extinguish a fire if one starts. I personally am always in the shack when Transmitting even though my Loading coils is 30 metres away in a field beside the antenna. de G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "wolf_dl4yhf" To: Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 5:36 PM Subject: Re: LF: SM6BGP > > Am 25.11.2012 17:41, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: > > MF, > > > > SM6BGP is running a QRSS-3 BEACON at 472.2 kHz. Mal, what do you think > > about that? ;-) > > > Similar as I do, even though I don't always agree with Mal. > Don't we have enough (commercial) MF beacons ? Why not move our own > beacons to the upper end of the band, in the vincinity of the other > beacons, and closer the QRSS / digimode area where beaconing doesn't > cause so much hassle as near the 'CW frequency', where most CW receivers > are "parking in idle" ? > > 73, > Wolf > > (thinking twice if its worth to try CW around 472.3 kHz tonight.. sigh...) > >