Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A94893800008D; Fri, 2 Nov 2012 12:50:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TUKRh-0007d4-EY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:50:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TUKRh-0007cv-1n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:50:13 +0000 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TUKRf-0005nc-73 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:50:11 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMWAB35k1BOk8hv/2dsb2JhbABEikW3ZgECgQaBCYIZBQEBBAEIAQEDJQEjAiYGAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYdwAwoHrVmONIwBdYErd4MkA41yiSOPKIJv X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,701,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="403916290" Received: from host-78-147-200-111.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.200.111]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 02 Nov 2012 16:50:10 +0000 Message-ID: <001101cdb91a$1e5e7ed0$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <5093EFA6.8030907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:50:08 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes it looks impressive and a few years back it was also like that on CW QSO mode. So what has happened ??? Since the introduction of DATA modes on LF most Radio Operators have left and gone back to 160 and other bands where a real QSO is possible. g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 3.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: LF: Re: Venezuela LF grabber Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60575093f9ea7594 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Yes it looks impressive and a few years back it was also like that on CW QSO mode. So what has happened ??? Since the introduction of DATA modes on LF most Radio Operators have left and gone back to 160 and other bands where a real QSO is possible. g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 4:07 PM Subject: LF: Venezuela LF grabber > LF! > > We are in the LF DX season since a few weeks. When looking to the DCF > plot at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/74746618/LF/YV7MAE_LF_Grabber.html it > looks like there are good chances for stronger EU and US LF stns to > leave a first trace in South America. > However there is not much activity in the EU60 and TA60 slots. Why? Are > we really spread out by to many bands and modes? > For comparison, see this capture from last year: > http://simnet.is/halldorgudmunds/TF3HZ_LFgrabber/Captures/31_12_11LFeight.jp g > > 73, GL! > Stefan/DK7FC >