Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6CA58380002E9; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:47:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Tdme4-0001C1-QK for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:46:04 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Tdme4-0001Bs-2z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:46:04 +0000 Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Tdme0-00041y-KJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:46:02 +0000 Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id V0CJ1k0020EZKEL516leGT; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:45:38 +0000 Received: from DELL4 ([71.234.119.9]) by omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id V6ld1k01S0CFS1j3M6lehy; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:45:38 +0000 Message-ID: <000e01cdcd98$8f437be0$6d01a8c0@DELL4> From: To: References: <50B6463E.9070705@princeton.edu> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 13:45:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1354128338; bh=VwPpFg9Lq7TgxWbzQdDjdfJfNavHhPSYCS4Cxnc2M5g=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=bLOrXFz2Pyer1TmRvCN7exVjmDE2jZPlG1SFcq7a/Nm0HL0o00t8Eb76RAgXq42gc NRzhDXPhYdVab4M8JbutrhfcXpZX1ZVyjGk9Fe19bhiFC+Bj4Ii+4GlTeq0yriItjW I2ETs2eopv5xmoO+Wpr5znb8f4ajlZo5vDAFQdM9CmtknpgNKAJPh+t4Gy4ZwtVIPi j/GwM1oRxrNeT1mLDmWe4NDadWZ59kZd4lNG9GzOU9xLGKCxvsyGrFyxgRnpdgM5cR hiGOSsFoJt+g6r89+kwH8k9lYMcgjwDiKwmW6iyfkkok4x4YmCTXUhw/ABgJjMJ/by ploXggQQnNt3w== X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Warren Same problem here with XP SP2. First time I've encountered this in any of the revisions. Jay [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 2.9 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: f7f918e40888a44a70dddae14bd6a529 Subject: Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2783 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mc03.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : comcast.net DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604b50b65c2f5af1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Warren Same problem here with XP SP2. First time I've encountered this in any of the revisions. Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: "Warren Ziegler" To: Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 1:14 PM Subject: Re: LF: WSJT-X v0.5 r2783 > Hello the list, > > I have installed WSJT-X from Prof. Taylor's web site on my Win XP machine. > When I click on the WSJT-X icon I get a pop-up "Error starting or > running program C:\Program Files \wsjtx\jt9-s " > and then the Windows error reporting box pops up. > > Do I need something other than Windows XP Professional Service pack 3 ? > > 73 & tnx! > Warren K2ORS > > > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Joe Taylor wrote: >> To: Users of WSJT-X >> From: Joe Taylor, K1JT >> >> A new revision of the experimental program WSJT-X has been posted. As >> usual, a link to it appears on the WSJT web site: >> >> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjt.html >> >> The following is a direct link to the installation file: >> >> http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJTX_05r2783.exe >> >> This revision has an unusually large number of changes relative to the >> previous release, v0.4 r2746. These changes include: >> >> 1. PTT control via COM ports COM10 and higher is enabled. >> >> 2. Improved decoder performance: higher speed as well as better chances of >> success. Moderate amounts of frequency drift are detected and compensated. >> Computed S/N values are more reliable. Time offsets from -2.5 to +5 s are >> now supported, which makes JT9 usable for EME. (EME tests on 144 MHz have >> been successful, and performance on that propagation mode appears to be >> good.) >> >> 3. Tx Frequency now tracks the selected QSO Frequency (unless you hold down >> the CTRL key when setting QSO Frequency via mouse-clicks or the F11/F12 >> keys). >> >> 4. Decoded text containing "CQ " is highlighted with green background; text >> including "MyCall" is highlighted in red. >> >> 5. In previous versions, signal reports were required to be in the range -30 >> to -01 dB. In v0.5 r2782 the range has been extended to -50 to +49 dB. >> There is backward compatibility for the range -30 to -01, but reports in the >> range -50 to -31 and 0 to +49 will NOT be decoded correctly by previous >> program versions. It is important to upgrade! >> >> 6. Items "Save Synced" and "Save Decoded" are now implemented. >> >> 7. UTC Date, JT9 submode, and a parameter related to the decoding procedure >> are now included in file wsjtx_rx.log. >> >> 8. Editing of Tx messages (in any of the six Tx message boxes) is complete >> when you hit "Tab" or "Return". The message is then parsed and converted to >> the form in which it will be displayed if decoding is successful. Free-text >> messages are trimmed to 13 characters and highlighted with a pink >> background. >> >> 9. The most recent transmitted message is displayed in the right-most label >> on the status bar. This can be useful if you have lost track of where you >> were in a QSO. >> >> 10. By default, the program now starts with Monitor ON. An option on the >> Setup menu allows you to select "Monitor OFF at startup". >> >> 11. Better scaling is provided for the red "JT9 Sync" curve. Note that JT9 >> signals in the active sub-mode should appear in this plot as a bump of width >> equal to the total signal bandwidth, with a narrow and slightly higher bump >> at the left edge. The narrow bump is the frequency of the Sync tone, which >> is defined as the nominal frequency of the JT9 signal. >> >> 12. Basic QSO information is now written to file wsjt.log when you click the >> "Log QSO" button. >> >> 13. The WSJT-X User's Guide has been updated. >> >> 14. Other known bugs have been fixed. There will probably be new ones! >> When you find one, or if you know of any old ones that have NOT been fixed, >> please send me email. >> >> Summary of Present Status >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> I believe that WSJT-X is now a stable and very usable program. Many >> thousands of QSOs have been made with JT9-1, mostly at HF -- I have made >> nearly 100, myself. Also a number of QSOs have also been completed at MF, >> and successful tests have been made on 2m EME, etc. A number of QSOs have >> also been made with JT9-2. >> >> As far as I know the slower modes (JT9-5, JT9-10, and JT9-30) also work >> correctly. (Certainly they do in my laboratory test setup.) Most people >> will find these modes too slow for "everyday" use, and they require high >> frequency stability. It remains to be seen whether they will be widely >> used. >> >> An alternative approach to obtaining improved sensitivity would be to give >> the decoder an ability to average over several successive transmissions. >> For example, the average of five JT9-1 transmissions could reach a decoding >> threshold around -32 dB, only 2 dB worse than a single JT9-5 transmission. >> Because of QSB, the shorter transmissions may actually succeed in less total >> time. Stability requirements would be those of JT9-1, much less stringent >> than those of JT9-5. >> >> Program development is not finished, by any means. I will be grateful for >> your feedback on performance issues, as well as your "wish-list" of features >> to be added. As always, example recordings of files that you think should >> have decoded, but did not, will be much appreciated. >> >> I hope to find time for more work on WSJT-X soon. Later this week, however, >> my radio time will be focused primarily on the ARRL International EME >> Contest. >> >> With best wishes, >> >> -- 73, Joe, K1JT >> > > > > -- > 73 Warren K2ORS > WD2XGJ > WD2XSH/23 > WE2XEB/2 > WE2XGR/1 >