Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 51ABF38000087; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:52:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSce7-0002QS-46 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:51:59 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSce6-0002Q8-8m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:51:58 +0000 Received: from mta01.eastlink.ca ([24.224.136.30]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSce3-0004iU-To for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:51:57 +0000 Received: from ip05.eastlink.ca ([24.222.39.68]) by mta01.eastlink.ca (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-21.01 64bit (built Feb 16 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MCM00927NMIS1Q0@mta01.eastlink.ca> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:51:54 -0300 (ADT) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=I4MetKcg c=1 sm=1 a=-HCs13U8lssA:10 a=FboMnbylzQsA:10 a=F3M5lZpKAAAA:8 a=rcmqHbOauVW756ahEk0A:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=wk6s2zzMB60A:10 a=uumO8NjxR8U7qY7SxLEA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=9q3PB6bUXIAA:10 a=wMPJOlJ0HNzQwG7U:21 a=/bLbuBD0lrv91xL1PDQKaA==:117 Received: from blk-222-221-76.eastlink.ca (HELO JimPC) ([24.222.221.76]) by ip05.eastlink.ca with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:51:54 -0300 Message-id: From: Jim and Hannelore Fisher To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508D47B2.8060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <46A9A1D9FC954A658216B197782524BF@White> <891CD59233F844C283BAC09A2AAA04BA@White> <508D6A9D.4020600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D6C1A.7050607@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D8084.6020501@freenet.de> <508DBB57.8050408@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-reply-to: <508DBB57.8050408@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:51:47 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: will switch to rx JT9-10 now. have been on JT9-2 seeing some signals but no decodes yet...maybe they were not -2. 73, Jim VE1JF ----- Original Message ----- From: Stefan Schäfer To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 11:10 PM Subject: LF: JT9-10 for TA distances on LF? [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [24.224.136.30 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.8 TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT To: misformatted and supposed Microsoft tool X-Scan-Signature: 968492e608ae81f946d7c13a3d073eeb Subject: LF: Re: JT9-10 for TA distances on LF? Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_102A_01CDB567.31307290" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4081508dc5434399 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_102A_01CDB567.31307290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable will switch to rx JT9-10 now. have been on JT9-2 seeing some signals but = no decodes yet...maybe they were not -2. 73, Jim VE1JF ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 11:10 PM Subject: LF: JT9-10 for TA distances on LF? Thank you Wolf! Probably it is a good idea to QSY to JT9-10 for the night. Is someone = in the US ready to go on 137.43 kHz? Waiting for reply before i QSY. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 28.10.2012 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:=20 Still many more decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from = DF2JP. I don't think Stefan's timing is the cause.. see this spectrogram = with lower frequency-, but larger time resolution: From that over, only 'CQ DF2JP JO31' was decoded. I have saved wave files from a couple of overs, all with basically = the same decoding result. 73, Wolf DL4YHF . ------=_NextPart_000_102A_01CDB567.31307290 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
will switch to rx JT9-10 now. have = been on=20 JT9-2 seeing some signals but no decodes yet...maybe they were not=20 -2.
 
73,
 
Jim VE1JF
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 = 11:10=20 PM
Subject: LF: JT9-10 for TA = distances on=20 LF?

Thank you Wolf!

Probably it is a good idea to = QSY to=20 JT9-10 for the night. Is someone in the US ready to go on 137.43 kHz? = Waiting=20 for reply before i QSY.

73, Stefan/DK7FC



Am = 28.10.2012=20 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:=20
Still = many more=20 decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from DF2JP.
I = don't think=20 Stefan's timing is the cause.. see this spectrogram with lower = frequency-,=20 but larger time resolution:



From that over, only 'CQ = DF2JP=20 JO31' was decoded.
I have saved wave files from a couple of = overs, all=20 with basically the same decoding result.

73, Wolf  = DL4YHF=20 .

------=_NextPart_000_102A_01CDB567.31307290--