Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 499ED380000FA; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:28:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TPyMN-0005oF-Pt for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 17:26:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TPyMN-0005o6-CZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 17:26:43 +0100 Received: from mail-da0-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1TPyML-0005Bb-P5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 17:26:42 +0100 Received: by mail-da0-f43.google.com with SMTP id u36so1196647dak.16 for ; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:26:38 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bY8blsNEnTY9EHidQr0Pi3r3I65TyzIbhfeviITRNFs=; b=JqKejPFg6y6X22NyQPPcHeochmkmPj6Vpma6ZLXWTC8cQOfEJdepoU9GNVSpDWIJKI 60tDGY5/91YSZHzQ4c7GILGwWsrDvvY741HnJq/fv3duPVTg4DBuy6JLQbVcJvDBrjLX mmbrIrfWskaR5edAFdYdJDmmX9suf0hFaDUxEs/2WHSwxJIgQ2+U4/LbvskTwTduPxdA LltK8NJVrilLapC+1QR3KWHWGWVzAubhWjzZXQxPfuzE9ZkOJStoRckJDp137yrQRM3i 0y5IQNc8ksUrRgKrsgJRluMkjBIeaHez2OKENUvLd/s8SS9T/H9pHqdZpsvhVm8pjK82 HqSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.204.137 with SMTP id ky9mr22875385pbc.90.1350836649478; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.48.202 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:24:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <001101cdaeb5$d701b7a0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> References: <001101cdaeb5$d701b7a0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 18:24:09 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Jay, Thanks for the capture! I was watching your grabber last night and saw the dropping SNR. So it was a QRN issue, all right. I've seen positive DST values. Is that good or does it become worse when 0 is crossed? [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.43 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (73dk7fc[at]googlemail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails X-Scan-Signature: 5c1f37c04fc013ebbc2288fd3791d043 Subject: Re: LF: T/A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-df02.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d65084229e778f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Jay, Thanks for the capture! I was watching your grabber last night and saw the dropping SNR. So it was a QRN issue, all right. I've seen positive DST values. Is that good or does it become worse when 0 is crossed? (We have a server problem so i have to write from this adress. Pse never reply to this adress). 73, Stefan/DK7FC 2012/10/20, jrusgrove@comcast.net : > Stefan & T/A enthusiasts > > Rising static levels lowered s/n as the night progressed. Fadeout at abou= t > 0600Z. Best copy, at > ~0130Z, shown below. Sorry, no copy of NM. Temps here this morning 64=B0F= ;~( > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 >