Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C13BE3800008E; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:41:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TR8Lj-000344-8l for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:18:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TR8Li-00033v-Kz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:18:50 +0100 Received: from blu0-omc1-s3.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.14]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TR8Lg-0001aI-4u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:18:49 +0100 Received: from BLU153-W62 ([65.55.116.7]) by blu0-omc1-s3.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:18:45 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [136.226.254.42] From: Laurence KL1 X To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:18:45 -0800 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <50884AFC.4020108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <508715CE.3000701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0D53475605DF40F08BF596E29708823E@AGB> <5087BF86.5010804@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <418E090825C04DFB81593EA54244F640@AGB>,<50884AFC.4020108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Oct 2012 21:18:45.0660 (UTC) FILETIME=[26B9DDC0:01CDB22D] X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: We had visual Aurora here in South Central Alaska and no decodes from anyone I think running Op 32 - it was also very windy in a small Katabatic at our QTH gustiung 45-50mph - inside where it was windy it was 32F and outside calm, just a mile or so 15F or less. Just needs to quieten down for a few more days but I think Im going to be dissapointed. At least SAQ was seen even whilst the 137 Opera was blasting away! Laurence WE2XPQ Part 5 KL 1 X > Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:09:32 +0200 > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: OP32 > > > Am 24.10.2012 18:27, schrieb Graham: > > > > May be the path east was better , as you have the same s/n > > over similar distance , where as east is over land ? > > > > UA0AET is showing as decoding at JA at the moment , may be > > now is a good time to try Tx while JA is in darkness > > The path to JA is (was) not open today, see the DCF plot at > http://icas.to/argo/eu.htm > Yesterday the QRN was way lower and the signal levels about the same, > i.e. the SNR was much better. And i was active to that time of the > highest DCF S/N. Anyway no trace at JA8SCD. It's more than twice the > distance to JA, compared to UA0AET. > > It's interesting that good decode levels, or clear spectrograms, can be > seen at UA0SNV. As you say, that distance over land is quite a challenge. > > But be sure, it is more likely to leave a trace to the right time and > right frequency than making a OP32 decode. That applies for the path to > DU1GM too, of course. > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > > > UA0AET JA8SCD 2200m OPERA 4163 kms 13:53:08 > > > > 73 -G.. > [...] Content analysis details: (0.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [65.55.116.14 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hellozerohellozero[at]hotmail.com) 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 2ee80849a5d572dbc974bb207a527753 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_2a6364fa-95a8-4d62-9d05-5c9c8326a9b8_" Subject: RE: LF: OP32 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD, HTML_MESSAGE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40865088609c6b6f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --_2a6364fa-95a8-4d62-9d05-5c9c8326a9b8_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We had visual Aurora here in South Central Alaska and no decodes from anyon= e I think running Op 32 - it was also very windy in a small Katabatic at ou= r QTH gustiung 45-50mph - inside where it was windy it was 32F and outside = calm=2C just a mile or so 15F or less. Just needs to quieten down for a few= more days but I think Im going to be dissapointed. At least SAQ was seen e= ven whilst the 137 Opera was blasting away! Laurence WE2XPQ Part 5 KL 1 X > Date: Wed=2C 24 Oct 2012 22:09:32 +0200 > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: OP32 >=20 >=20 > Am 24.10.2012 18:27=2C schrieb Graham: > > > > May be the path east was better =2C as you have the same s/n = =20 > > over similar distance =2C where as east is over land ? > > > > UA0AET is showing as decoding at JA at the moment =2C may be =20 > > now is a good time to try Tx while JA is in darkness >=20 > The path to JA is (was) not open today=2C see the DCF plot at=20 > http://icas.to/argo/eu.htm > Yesterday the QRN was way lower and the signal levels about the same=2C=20 > i.e. the SNR was much better. And i was active to that time of the=20 > highest DCF S/N. Anyway no trace at JA8SCD. It's more than twice the=20 > distance to JA=2C compared to UA0AET. >=20 > It's interesting that good decode levels=2C or clear spectrograms=2C can = be=20 > seen at UA0SNV. As you say=2C that distance over land is quite a challeng= e. >=20 > But be sure=2C it is more likely to leave a trace to the right time and=20 > right frequency than making a OP32 decode. That applies for the path to=20 > DU1GM too=2C of course. >=20 > 73=2C Stefan/DK7FC >=20 >=20 > > > > UA0AET JA8SCD 2200m OPERA 4163 kms 13:53:08 > > > > 73 -G..=20 >=20 = --_2a6364fa-95a8-4d62-9d05-5c9c8326a9b8_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We had visual Aurora here in =3BSouth Central Alaska and no decodes fro= m anyone I think running Op 32 =3B- it was also very windy in a small K= atabatic at our QTH gustiung 45-50mph - inside where it was windy it was 32= F and outside calm=2C just a mile or so 15F or less.
 =3B
Just ne= eds to quieten down for a few more days but I think Im going to be dissapoi= nted. At least SAQ was seen even whilst the 137 Opera =3Bwas blasting a= way!
 =3B
 =3B
Laurence WE2XPQ Part 5 =3B KL 1 X
&n= bsp=3B
>=3B Date: Wed=2C 24= Oct 2012 22:09:32 +0200
>=3B From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg= .de
>=3B To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>=3B Subject: Re: LF: O= P32
>=3B
>=3B
>=3B Am 24.10.2012 18:27=2C schrieb Graham:<= br>>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B May be the path east was better =2C= as you have the same s/n
>=3B >=3B over similar distance =2C= where as east is over land ?
>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B UA0AET is= showing as decoding at JA at the moment =2C may be
>=3B >= =3B now is a good time to try Tx while JA is in darkness
>=3B <= br>>=3B The path to JA is (was) not open today=2C see the DCF plot at >=3B http://icas.to/argo/eu.htm
>=3B Yesterday the QRN was way lowe= r and the signal levels about the same=2C
>=3B i.e. the SNR was much = better. And i was active to that time of the
>=3B highest DCF S/N. An= yway no trace at JA8SCD. It's more than twice the
>=3B distance to JA= =2C compared to UA0AET.
>=3B
>=3B It's interesting that good dec= ode levels=2C or clear spectrograms=2C can be
>=3B seen at UA0SNV. As= you say=2C that distance over land is quite a challenge.
>=3B
>= =3B But be sure=2C it is more likely to leave a trace to the right time and=
>=3B right frequency than making a OP32 decode. That applies for the= path to
>=3B DU1GM too=2C of course.
>=3B
>=3B 73=2C Stef= an/DK7FC
>=3B
>=3B
>=3B >=3B
>=3B >=3B UA0AET = JA8SCD 2200m OPERA 4163 kms 13:53:08
>=3B >=3B
>= =3B >=3B 73 -G..
>=3B
= --_2a6364fa-95a8-4d62-9d05-5c9c8326a9b8_--