Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4898838000081; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:26:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TN6Os-00042q-Tg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:25:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TN6Or-00042h-Sk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:25:25 +0100 Received: from nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.197]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TN6Op-0000e6-Kc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:25:24 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.53] by nm9.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Oct 2012 18:25:22 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.227] by tm6.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Oct 2012 18:25:22 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Oct 2012 18:25:22 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 685643.25220.bm@omp1004.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 95255 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2012 18:25:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=L2EWvJsrqU1K9mi7tv05JS+zgihttrlI8DfIqBKm+oQMh61sdO25vrZQ+0Z7Z7KCOVQV+51JllbHJ/QMjXkIivdlCOc3aqelqTHUp6COi4cKH0kudFD+E9/H+WrNVc8KgQyjcSi1N7rcIr+LhjF8UZYSLMPKje0rpyBLIEeWPU0= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1350152722; bh=tltGaxY9EYKVS2gAJEJe9e4AZMfvjZi6sObNPoowgp4=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=nNtx7I0qoSOn+eFHSZ6LTK05+9q935jnuYyvBrTNiW6tzTeT5dIg22sUaVN2A1dM47xrBJyVk5MNPkcuc7JD2cVFSGTVHi+NgfQ6v2Z14YqL1s5g0gt5576xcsDtUhUKyYJlzPu/x7EqD9hH4xPDeco2N4Q7ZtGJylWkAEZQJME= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: s8BBdpQVM1mxm.9BTjdjbm.6t2wigqOJFWVbOPGwgO6fMbT VFwMGUMswF_nSoegtXxHRH5rIfoLOfWA.iVkEw13Gl6c0oR_e7v2srp68clG HN4YxC3waCFV7lR8nUjXURPYWApdAsiNQsDEY877x.0uTJeWlRksTb0oyTUp f3bYy1EB7cdmBXLmHe61ZVV3eaImB6SJfBhaD12plJliCn09LVjgucidT0Wz kOjk4kum3khPFhRdVfTYxSbHsukQrJMIHCcnqbYwMxI7JlrPXQpePGNOEP3l YZgpj5WqUNx2UwdZBlO2Orp1QChRRJ2NLeJnImrmbvp1dD54YaRah6H63uIm P7tcohcNCHopy3Go3HHN8OyiyBGDi32Gv0Qg5t_780UluD7q2rHmcgaTvoTK 3t_M7bOV2Y1wVlD_RxZfOKoqxdDM2RZ1rszHaixoFx8Qu6Ka7VnuBNujaAnQ Zwno- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from gnat (alan.melia@109.151.93.22 with login) by smtp815.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Oct 2012 11:25:22 -0700 PDT Message-ID: From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <50782029.2030005@psk31.plus.com> <507947F2.6080809@psk31.plus.com> <50795F14.1030207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50797274.3050401@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:24:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121013-1, 13/10/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Eddie my commisserations on you interference, but can I refer you to the regulations and in particular the "conditions of your (TV) licence" "You must not cause undue interference to any other radio television reception with your TV eqipment" [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.197 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 8556389a5ea14fbbf9b9d801ab70c592 Subject: Re: LF: EMI... Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mg04.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cc5079b24e2d07 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Eddie my commisserations on you interference, but can I refer you to the regulations and in particular the "conditions of your (TV) licence" "You must not cause undue interference to any other radio television reception with your TV eqipment" Note it does not say "broadcast". It is interesting you have interference at 500kHz but not 472kHz. This almost suggests an older CRT system with 15.625kHz line scan coils. Plasma interference is usualy from one of the PSUs and is radiated by the braid of the aerial. A TV braid breaker will often cure this. If you are on good terms with your neighbour it might be worth drawing their attention to the licence conditions, and suggest they contact their supplier, as you may have to make a complaint. The supplier might be more "sensitive" than the neighbour, you may then suggest a "cure" to try. The RSGB did used to stock these filters which are normally used for VHF but are very effective for SMPSU radiation. It does work and these problems can be cured. Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" To: Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2012 2:53 PM Subject: Re: LF: EMI... > On 13/10/2012 13:31, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> >> >> no chance in the UK to complain about the QRMing TV to an authority? Here >> in DL, we can monthly read in our club magazine how amateurs force their >> neighbours to switch off devices producing EMI to them... >> >> 73, Stefan >> > No Stefan, money talks. > The big manufacturers have got their TV's, Computer PSU's and Power Line > Wifi devices passed despite them being above the permitted radiation > levels. > Amateur Radio is not a protected service, so, unless the device is causing > interference to Broadcast or has a fault causing interference greater than > the manufactured level you are stuck and noise levels just rise all the > time. > > There are several Panasonic Plasma TV's round here, several thousand > pounds worth, if it was possible I would complain about them all and have > them all scrapped. I can't even QRM the things.:-( > > Of course there are exceptions, some PLT devices have been replaced for > wireless devices free by BT who should have known better and not installed > them in the first place. The RSGB even started collecting donations for a > private fighting fund to take the authorities on in a court of law re PLT. > > 73 Eddie >