Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 210DB38000089; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:05:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSUPl-00034g-Jy for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:04:37 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSUPl-00034X-5F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:04:37 +0000 Received: from imr-da02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.144]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSUPj-00010H-6s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:04:36 +0000 Received: from mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.77]) by imr-da02.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 633E01C00005F for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:04:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-dfc002c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dfc002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.55.7]) by mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 34874E000081 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:04:33 -0400 (EDT) References: <508D47B2.8060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <508D47B2.8060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Markus Vester X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: Webmail 37105-BASIC Received: from 77.7.78.170 by webmail-m054.sysops.aol.com (64.12.158.154) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:04:32 -0400 Message-Id: <8CF8334ABF95617-1C88-181C0@webmail-m054.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [77.7.78.170] Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:04:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20110426; t=1351436673; bh=/VGSNy+Lca5ioRZi9+u3i+FYOI6LCPbKzkKiPIc/cKg=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tn+RBAocxZTtrpFIgkgmELQ4GtzHqFThDH7aSTvTPw+aOP209cXwyZEIpxnKcEZP0 u/AAkaDTkWy6m7rOqv1FFWfvrMg3APbo+4W2rarpVhYC8STMCIu5ldXFFeWrpU4MTh pUt9e23gRgKaMQkH9pyqGwWjfEhCuaB/m1VLTdOM= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:393016736:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: ... same situation here, must be PA0A. WSJTx seems to sync but doesn't decode the callsign..  I also called 10 Hz lower, JT9-2 even slots.  Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Verschickt: So, 28 Okt 2012 2:58 pm Betreff: LF: no decodes, help needed [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [205.188.105.144 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (markusvester[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7c7a1907d3a7d57b28660e5fb4c32107 Subject: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CF8334ABFBB778_1C88_58EAF_webmail-m054.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-dk03.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : mx.aol.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db407508d49b31c78 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CF8334ABFBB778_1C88_58EAF_webmail-m054.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" ... same situation here, must be PA0A. WSJTx seems to sync but doesn't deco= de the callsign..=20 =C2=A0 I=C2=A0also called 10 Hz lower, JT9-2 even slots. =C2=A0 Best 73,=20 Markus (DF6NM) -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> Verschickt: So, 28 Okt 2012 2:58 pm Betreff: LF: no decodes, help needed LF,=20 =20 I'm now receiving in JT9-1 on 137.43 kHz. I can see a strong JT9-2 =20 signal but there is no decode. The signal appears in the programs =20 waterfal display. Timing is accurate. The SNR must be at least 15 dB = =20 above the decode level.=20 =20 See this capture https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/JT9.png=20 =20 Has someone an idea?=20 =20 =20 =20 73, Stefan/DK7FC=20 =20 =20 ----------MB_8CF8334ABFBB778_1C88_58EAF_webmail-m054.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
... same situation here, must be PA0A. WSJTx seems to sync but doesn't deco= de the callsign..
 
I als= o called 10 Hz lower, JT9-2 even slots.
 
Best 73, <= /div>
Markus (DF= 6NM)


-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: So, 28 Okt 2012 2:58 pm
Betreff: LF: no decodes, help needed




LF, 

     

    I'm now receiving in JT9-1 on 137.43 kHz. I can see a strong JT9-2  
    signal but there is no decode. The signal appears in the programs  

    waterfal display. Timing is accurate. The SNR must be at least 15 dB  <=
br>
    above the decode level. 

     

    See this capture https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/JT9.png 

     

    Has someone an idea? 

     

     

     

    73, Stefan/DK7FC


----------MB_8CF8334ABFBB778_1C88_58EAF_webmail-m054.sysops.aol.com--