Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 77C8B38000089; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:17:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TSYM8-0007gQ-59 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:17:08 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TSYM7-0007gH-Jz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:17:07 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.130] helo=cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TSYM5-0002sf-LX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:17:06 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: A6A93128045.A263E X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A93128045 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:16:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB4.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub4.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97574042 for ; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:16:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::312b:f3bc:9c4:4ebb]) by ICTS-S-HUB4.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::c11b:83f0:c46c:c366%26]) with mapi id 14.02.0309.002; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:16:53 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: LF: no decodes, help needed Thread-Index: AQHNtS/RmQd0Md+EbUiZUdR1t5+EpJfO52iAgAABxgCAABhWAIAAAfqAgAATFdc= Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 19:16:52 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB5090C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <508D47B2.8060209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <46A9A1D9FC954A658216B197782524BF@White> <891CD59233F844C283BAC09A2AAA04BA@White> <508D6A9D.4020600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D6C1A.7050607@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <508D8084.6020501@freenet.de>,<508D822D.9010804@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <508D822D.9010804@freenet.de> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.112.13.12] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 134.58.240.130 (rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Wolf, Stefan, all, that's what I got here: 1750 8 -23 0.4 1430.59 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1754 6 -24 0.4 1430.59 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1758 7 -24 0.4 1430.43 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1810 8 -23 0.4 1430.59 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1814 10 -23 0.4 1430.35 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1822 5 -25 0.4 1430.43 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1826 10 -21 -0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1830 10 -21 -0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1834 10 -20 0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1838 10 -19 0.0 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1842 10 -21 -0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1846 10 -19 -0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1850 10 -21 0.0 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1854 10 -21 0.0 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1858 10 -21 -0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1902 4 -26 0.4 1430.35 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.58.240.130 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: cd79e98bb57cf38a756c15469b5a993e Subject: RE: LF: no decodes, help needed Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB5090CICTSSMBX5lunaku_" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_MESSAGE,LINES_OF_YELLING,LINES_OF_YELLING_2,TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8d508d84e62f6b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB5090CICTSSMBX5lunaku_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Wolf, Stefan, all, that's what I got here: 1750 8 -23 0.4 1430.59 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1754 6 -24 0.4 1430.59 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1758 7 -24 0.4 1430.43 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1810 8 -23 0.4 1430.59 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1814 10 -23 0.4 1430.35 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1822 5 -25 0.4 1430.43 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W 1826 10 -21 -0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1830 10 -21 -0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1834 10 -20 0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1838 10 -19 0.0 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1842 10 -21 -0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1846 10 -19 -0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1850 10 -21 0.0 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1854 10 -21 0.0 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1858 10 -21 -0.1 1450.94 0.00 CQ DF2JP JO31 1902 4 -26 0.4 1430.35 0.00 DK7FC TEST 5W Despite the fact that DK7FC produces a much stronger trace DF2JP gets bette= r decodes. 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens wolf_dl4yhf [dl4yhf@freenet.de] Verzonden: zondag 28 oktober 2012 20:06 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed Am 28.10.2012 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: Still many more decodes from DK7FC, even though stronger, than from DF2JP. Excuses, that should have read: ... less decodes from DK7FC, even through stronger than DF2JP.. Actually, now each of DF2JP's overs is decoded, but (almost) none from Stef= an even though his signal is still stronger in JO42 . 73, Wolf DL4YHF . --_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB5090CICTSSMBX5lunaku_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Wolf, Stefan, all,

 

that's what = I got here:

 

1750   8  -2= 3   0.4 1430.59  0.00   DK7FC TEST&nbs= p;5W        
1754   6  -24   0.4 1430.59  0.00  =  DK7FC TEST 5W      &= nbsp; 
1758   7  -24   0.4 1430.43  0.00  =  DK7FC TEST 5W      &= nbsp; 
1810   8  -23   0.4 1430.59  0.00  =  DK7FC TEST 5W      &= nbsp; 
1814  10  -23   0.4 1430.35  0.00   = ;DK7FC TEST 5W       =  
1822   5  -25   0.4 1430.43  0.00  =  DK7FC TEST 5W      &= nbsp; 
1826  10  -21  -0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31      = ;  
1830  10  -21  -0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31      = ;  
1834  10  -20   0.1 1450.94  0.00   = ;CQ DF2JP JO31     =    
1838  10  -19   0.0 1450.94  0.00   = ;CQ DF2JP JO31     =    
1842  10  -21  -0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31      = ;  
1846  10  -19  -0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31      = ;  
1850  10  -21   0.0 1450.94  0.00   = ;CQ DF2JP JO31     =    
1854  10  -21   0.0 1450.94  0.00   = ;CQ DF2JP JO31     =    
1858  10  -21  -0.1 1450.94  0.00   CQ DF2JP JO31      = ;  
1902   4  -26   0.4 1430.35  0.00  =  DK7FC TEST 5W    &= nbsp;   

Despite the fa= ct that DK7FC produces a mu= ch stronger trace DF2JP get= s better decodes.

 

73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T

 

Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [o= wner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens wolf_dl4yhf [dl4yhf@freenet.de] Verzonden: zondag 28 oktober 2012 20:06
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Onderwerp: Re: LF: no decodes, help needed

Am 28.10.2012 19:59, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf:
Still many more decodes from DK7FC, even though s= tronger, than from DF2JP.

Excuses, that should have read:
... less decodes from DK7FC, even through stronger than DF2JP..

Actually, now each of DF2JP's overs is decoded, but (almost) none from Stef= an even though his signal is still stronger in JO42 .


73, Wolf  DL4YHF .


--_000_7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB5090CICTSSMBX5lunaku_--