Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id DF371380000AD; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:28:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTJLR-00064u-Tr for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:27:33 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTJLR-00064l-Ev for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:27:33 +0000 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTJLP-00045B-CL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:27:32 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.8.162]) by mwinf5d19 with ME id HZTW1k0033VlNCJ03ZTWgX; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:27:30 +0100 Message-ID: <5834B15783324F4D986AC1B7DCE23896@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <508FDF4E.7070109@broadpark.no> <508FDF88.8020706@broadpark.no> <500F0ABE29C140E7BA52A38E66D5F7D9@AGB> <50903AA3.1040502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50904097.5060800@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <50904097.5060800@broadpark.no> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:27:30 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Depends on how much power you are going to use ..... 50 / 70 watts , you can get away with a big version of a top band tuner , parallel tapped tuner .....over this voltage / flashover becomes a problem for a end fed Ae , I use a top loading coil, seems to keep the atu voltage down .. [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 0cdfd8d5ce44f1724c623c4ac9f44df6 Subject: Re: LF: Antenna tuner Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600b509046740216 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Depends on how much power you are going to use ..... 50 / 70 watts , you can get away with a big version of a top band tuner , parallel tapped tuner .....over this voltage / flashover becomes a problem for a end fed Ae , I use a top loading coil, seems to keep the atu voltage down .. Over that , you need to use a auto transformer and series variable inductance , luckily most normal HF swr meters read at 500 , which makes tuning a lot simpler ........but if you cannot reach 1:1 , you could have harmonics , the swr meter , showing the reflected harmonics from the Ae load .. A good reason to use a wide band swr metering system ... band only ones will miss out of band harmonics At gb4fpr , feeding 200/300 watts in to the 600 ft delta loop, there is very little voltage in the tuner 73 -G. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Steinar Aanesland" Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 9:03 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Antenna tuner > Hi, thanks for the feedbacks from both of you . > > > "Why using such a big monster tuner? Because it is commercial?" Hehe, > absolutely not Stefan :) but a ham friend of my gave it to me when he > heard about my 600m transverter project. I will probably take it a part > an use it for other antenna projects. > > I am now planing to make my own variometer, just for the fun of it. I am > a novice you know , and I have to take the small steps to learn. I came > across this page describing in easy terms how to make a variometer, > http://www.giangrandi.ch/electronics/shortanttuner/shortanttuner.shtml . > It seems not be too difficult :) > > LA5VNA Steinar > loc:JO59jq > Mal and spam filtering: STRONG > www.opera.no > > > > > Den 30.10.2012 21:37, skrev Stefan Schäfer: >> Steinar, >> >> Graham is right, the coil may be to small for a small amateur antenna. >> >> Why using such a big monster tuner? Because it is commercial? >> >> We have only 7 kHz of spectrum and assuming "normal" sourrounding >> losses, you will not even need a variometer part. So it is just a coil, >> some wire on a PVC tube and a ferrite transformer (or a tap or what you >> prefer), then cox to the shack. >> >> No problem! :-) >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> Am 30.10.2012 21:24, schrieb Graham: >>> Steiner >>> >>> That looks a little 1.6 MHz ish to me .coils may be not >>> big enough . could be the 500 variometer is missing from the >>> space ? >>> >>> could make a auto transformer , next need a series coil of >>> sorts , Ae cap will do the rest >>> >>> G.. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >>> From: "Steinar Aanesland" >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 2:09 PM >>> To: >>> Subject: LF: Antenna tuner >>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> Is there anyone out there who is familiar with this antenna tuner? >>>> >>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.49.15.jpg >>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.49.36.jpg >>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.49.50.jpg >>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.50.00.jpg >>>> >>>> I got it from a HAM friend and will try to use it to tune my 600m >>>> antenna. The trouble is that some parts are missing. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> LA5VNA Steinar >>>> loc:JO59jq >>>> Mal and spam filtering: STRONG >>>> www.opera.no >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> > > >