Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AC0CB380000B5; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:14:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTfbn-0008Nh-8K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:13:55 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTfbm-0008NY-Pn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:13:54 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTfbj-0007Qa-LT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:13:53 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArwBADmJkVBcGSjp/2dsb2JhbAANN4t2tCOIDhgWGAMCAQIBWAgBAa9dk26PD4MkA5V2kzE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,688,1344207600"; d="scan'208,217";a="408589563" Received: from host-92-25-40-233.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.3]) ([92.25.40.233]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2012 21:13:50 +0000 Message-ID: <5091948D.5080903@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:13:49 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Well we may get there one day. My first transmission using v2711 monitored in the shack *exactly as previously described and failed with v2706* :- 2054 10 2 0.1 1401.37 0.00 G3ZJO IO92 [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 8ef270cc2ec30cd34b6313d7ada17a45 Subject: LF: 500kHz JT9-2 v2711 Who called me Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030705050109030808000205" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, LINES_OF_YELLING autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4acf509194c52133 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030705050109030808000205 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Well we may get there one day. My first transmission using v2711 monitored in the shack *exactly as previously described and failed with v2706* :- 2054 10 2 0.1 1401.37 0.00 G3ZJO IO92 Some one called me, a fine signal. :- 2056 10 -12 -0.4 1387.53 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -2 -0.4 1395.59 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 24 -0.4 1403.64 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -9 -0.4 1411.70 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -8 -0.4 1419.76 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -16 -0.4 1427.81 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -15 -0.4 1435.87 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -15 -0.4 1443.93 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -14 -0.4 1348.71 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -8 -0.4 1356.77 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -12 -0.4 1364.82 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -14 -0.4 1372.88 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -9 -0.4 1380.94 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -8 -0.4 1388.99 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 6 -0.4 1397.05 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 24 -0.4 1405.11 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -8 -0.4 1413.16 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -14 -0.4 1421.22 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -12 -0.4 1429.28 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -16 -0.4 1437.33 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 2056 10 -17 -0.4 1445.39 0.00 15P6715P67WCV Arrrgh 21 false decodes instead of the usual 12 with v2706. Fancy a Morse contact Mal.:-) :-) :-) Eddie --------------030705050109030808000205 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Well we may get there one day.

My first transmission using v2711 monitored in the shack exactly as previously described and failed with v2706 :-

2054  10    2   0.1 1401.37  0.00   G3ZJO IO92

Some one called me, a fine signal. :-

2056  10  -12  -0.4 1387.53  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10   -2  -0.4 1395.59  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10   24  -0.4 1403.64  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10   -9  -0.4 1411.70  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10   -8  -0.4 1419.76  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10  -16  -0.4 1427.81  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10  -15  -0.4 1435.87  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10  -15  -0.4 1443.93  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10  -14  -0.4 1348.71  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10   -8  -0.4 1356.77  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10  -12  -0.4 1364.82  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10  -14  -0.4 1372.88  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10   -9  -0.4 1380.94  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10   -8  -0.4 1388.99  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10    6  -0.4 1397.05  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10   24  -0.4 1405.11  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10   -8  -0.4 1413.16  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10  -14  -0.4 1421.22  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10  -12  -0.4 1429.28  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10  -16  -0.4 1437.33  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
2056  10  -17  -0.4 1445.39  0.00   15P6715P67WCV

Arrrgh 21 false decodes instead of the usual 12 with v2706.

Fancy a Morse contact Mal. :-) :-) :-)

Eddie

--------------030705050109030808000205--