Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C1A00380000A5; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:48:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTbSE-0004ZU-Tp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:47:46 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTbSE-0004ZL-9H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:47:46 +0000 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTbSC-0004so-08 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:47:45 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsABALdVkVBcGSjp/2dsb2JhbAANN4t2uyABAQEBA0lACwkLBAkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBsR6TWot4hjsDlXaTMQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,687,1344207600"; d="scan'208,217";a="408125335" Received: from host-92-25-40-233.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([92.25.40.233]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 31 Oct 2012 16:47:41 +0000 Message-ID: <5091564C.2000002@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:48:12 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <50913785.1090003@psk31.plus.com> <50913A14.50200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50913FF1.9020500@psk31.plus.com> <509142F9.9040301@psk31.plus.com> <50914562.9060801@psk31.plus.com> <50914749.1070405@psk31.plus.com> <509148E0.4050705@psk31.plus.com> <50914ABF.1060601@psk31.plus.com> <50914CE4.5040509@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <50914CE4.5040509@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: 1614 G8HUH failed decode 1624 DK7FC failed 1628 both in same slot only G8HUH decoded 1632 partial broken sig from G8HUH Well that is very annoying after last nights problems on 500KHz I can even explain the false decodes in the list. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 14522a7d8bfffcae5e92e35059f18ae1 Subject: Re: LF: Re: DK7FC 137.440 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010804010708020504010508" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, LINES_OF_YELLING autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14a5091566122ab X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010804010708020504010508 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit 1614 G8HUH failed decode 1624 DK7FC failed 1628 both in same slot only G8HUH decoded 1632 partial broken sig from G8HUH Well that is very annoying after last nights problems on 500KHz I can even explain the false decodes in the list. 1520 9 -23 0.2 1436.03 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1522 10 -22 -0.4 1450.05 0.00 1524 10 -21 0.1 1435.95 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1526 8 -23 0.2 1449.71 0.00 1528 9 -23 0.1 1436.03 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1530 10 -22 0.4 1449.37 0.00 1532 10 -22 0.1 1435.95 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1534 10 -20 0.4 1449.86 0.00 1536 8 -23 -0.4 1449.47 0.00 1538 10 -22 -0.2 1450.13 0.00 1540 7 -24 0.2 1436.03 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1542 7 -24 0.3 1449.32 0.00 1544 10 -22 0.2 1435.95 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1546 10 -16 0.2 1449.13 0.00 1546 10 -17 0.2 1449.37 0.00 L9MK-156N?WH4 1548 7 -24 0.0 1436.13 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1550 10 -15 0.1 1449.21 0.00 DK7FC G8HUH -12 1552 8 -23 0.3 1436.13 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1554 10 -18 0.3 1449.37 0.00 DK7FC G8HUH -13 1556 0 -29 0.0 1454.02 0.00 1558 10 -22 0.1 1449.39 0.00 CQ G8HUH 1600 1 -28 0.3 1436.13 0.00 1602 10 -19 0.3 1449.37 0.00 CQ G8HUH 1604 4 -25 0.2 1436.13 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1606 10 -19 0.2 1449.37 0.00 CQ G8HUH 1608 6 -24 0.2 1436.13 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1610 10 -20 0.2 1449.37 0.00 CQ G8HUH 1612 8 -23 0.2 1435.95 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1614 10 -16 -0.1 1449.39 0.00 1616 9 -23 -0.1 1435.95 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1616 9 -23 -0.4 1435.95 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 1618 10 -20 0.0 1449.37 0.00 .05W ERP T AN 1620 9 -23 0.0 1435.95 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP 1622 10 -19 0.1 1449.37 0.00 WELCOME JT9 1624 4 -25 -0.4 1436.21 0.00 1624 10 -22 -0.4 1449.37 0.00 G8HUH IO81MG 1626 10 -19 -0.4 1449.37 0.00 G8HUH IO81MG 1626 10 -19 -0.4 1449.37 0.00 15P6715P67WCV 1628 10 -20 -0.1 1449.37 0.00 DK7FC G8HUH -11 1628 10 -18 -0.1 1449.47 0.00 1628 10 -18 0.0 1449.47 0.00 1628 10 -20 0.0 1449.39 0.00 1630 0 -29 0.0 1465.59 0.00 1632 10 -20 -0.3 1449.39 0.00 1632 4 -25 -0.2 1450.10 0.00 /HFAN156N?ROR I must go and try 500KHz again, I wonder if the aberration occurs when the prog is used for TX. Eddie On 31/10/2012 16:08, g3zjo wrote: > 1556 weak failed to decode. > 1600 slight freq drift? failed decode > 1604 OK > > G8HUH consistent -22 to -18dB > > On 31/10/2012 15:58, g3zjo wrote: >> Sorry messed that LOC up >> >> 1546 10 -17 0.2 1449.37 0.00 L9MK-156N?WH4 >> 1548 7 -24 0.0 1436.13 0.00 DK7FC JN49QRP >> 1550 10 -15 0.1 1449.21 0.00 DK7FC G8HUH -12 >> >> >> >> On 31/10/2012 15:50, g3zjo wrote: >>> There is another station on 137.450 stated late decoded it later as >>> L9MK JN49QRP interesting. >>> >>> On 31/10/2012 15:44, g3zjo wrote: >>>> No de-code at 1536 visible frequency drift on your signal >>>> 1540 OK. >>>> >>>> Eddie >>>> >>>> On 31/10/2012 15:36, g3zjo wrote: >>>>> Hi Stefan >>>>> >>>>> Consistent results at this time. big file of reports later. >>>>> >>>>> Eddie >>>>> >>>> >>>> No virus found in this message. >>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: >>>> 10/31/12 >>>> >>> >>> No virus found in this message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: >>> 10/31/12 >>> >> >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: 10/31/12 >> > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: 10/31/12 > --------------010804010708020504010508 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
1614 G8HUH failed decode
1624 DK7FC failed
1628 both in same slot only G8HUH decoded
1632 partial broken sig from G8HUH
Well that is very annoying after last nights problems on 500KHz I can even explain the false decodes in the list.

1520   9  -23   0.2 1436.03  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1522  10  -22  -0.4 1450.05  0.00
1524  10  -21   0.1 1435.95  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1526   8  -23   0.2 1449.71  0.00
1528   9  -23   0.1 1436.03  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1530  10  -22   0.4 1449.37  0.00
1532  10  -22   0.1 1435.95  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1534  10  -20   0.4 1449.86  0.00
1536   8  -23  -0.4 1449.47  0.00
1538  10  -22  -0.2 1450.13  0.00
1540   7  -24   0.2 1436.03  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1542   7  -24   0.3 1449.32  0.00
1544  10  -22   0.2 1435.95  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1546  10  -16   0.2 1449.13  0.00
1546  10  -17   0.2 1449.37  0.00   L9MK-156N?WH4        
1548   7  -24   0.0 1436.13  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1550  10  -15   0.1 1449.21  0.00   DK7FC G8HUH -12      
1552   8  -23   0.3 1436.13  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1554  10  -18   0.3 1449.37  0.00   DK7FC G8HUH -13      
1556   0  -29   0.0 1454.02  0.00
1558  10  -22   0.1 1449.39  0.00   CQ G8HUH             
1600   1  -28   0.3 1436.13  0.00
1602  10  -19   0.3 1449.37  0.00   CQ G8HUH             
1604   4  -25   0.2 1436.13  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1606  10  -19   0.2 1449.37  0.00   CQ G8HUH             
1608   6  -24   0.2 1436.13  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1610  10  -20   0.2 1449.37  0.00   CQ G8HUH             
1612   8  -23   0.2 1435.95  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1614  10  -16  -0.1 1449.39  0.00
1616   9  -23  -0.1 1435.95  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1616   9  -23  -0.4 1435.95  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
1618  10  -20   0.0 1449.37  0.00   .05W ERP T AN        
1620   9  -23   0.0 1435.95  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1622  10  -19   0.1 1449.37  0.00   WELCOME  JT9         
1624   4  -25  -0.4 1436.21  0.00
1624  10  -22  -0.4 1449.37  0.00   G8HUH IO81MG         
1626  10  -19  -0.4 1449.37  0.00   G8HUH IO81MG         
1626  10  -19  -0.4 1449.37  0.00   15P6715P67WCV        
1628  10  -20  -0.1 1449.37  0.00   DK7FC G8HUH -11      
1628  10  -18  -0.1 1449.47  0.00
1628  10  -18   0.0 1449.47  0.00
1628  10  -20   0.0 1449.39  0.00
1630   0  -29   0.0 1465.59  0.00
1632  10  -20  -0.3 1449.39  0.00
1632   4  -25  -0.2 1450.10  0.00   /HFAN156N?ROR    

I must go and try 500KHz again, I wonder if the aberration occurs when the prog is used for TX.

Eddie

On 31/10/2012 16:08, g3zjo wrote:
1556 weak failed to decode.
1600 slight freq drift? failed decode
1604 OK

G8HUH consistent -22 to -18dB

On 31/10/2012 15:58, g3zjo wrote:
Sorry messed that LOC up

1546  10  -17   0.2 1449.37  0.00   L9MK-156N?WH4        
1548   7  -24   0.0 1436.13  0.00   DK7FC JN49QRP        
1550  10  -15   0.1 1449.21  0.00   DK7FC G8HUH -12   



On 31/10/2012 15:50, g3zjo wrote:
There is another station on 137.450 stated late decoded it later as L9MK JN49QRP interesting.

On 31/10/2012 15:44, g3zjo wrote:
No de-code at 1536 visible frequency drift on your signal
1540 OK.

Eddie

On 31/10/2012 15:36, g3zjo wrote:
Hi Stefan

Consistent results at this time. big file of reports later.

Eddie


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: 10/31/12


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: 10/31/12


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: 10/31/12


No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5365 - Release Date: 10/31/12


--------------010804010708020504010508--