Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B6023380000A3; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:16:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTK5l-0007U1-Ag for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:15:25 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTK5k-0007Ts-RG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:15:24 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTK5i-0004gN-Ij for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:15:23 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q9UMFL3u026155 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:15:21 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9UMFL3I022085 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:15:21 +0100 Message-ID: <50905171.9040506@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:15:13 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <508FDF4E.7070109@broadpark.no> <508FDF88.8020706@broadpark.no> <500F0ABE29C140E7BA52A38E66D5F7D9@AGB> <50903AA3.1040502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50904097.5060800@broadpark.no> <5834B15783324F4D986AC1B7DCE23896@AGB> In-Reply-To: <5834B15783324F4D986AC1B7DCE23896@AGB> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q9UMFL3u026155 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Steinar, Instead of a HF SWR meter i vote for building a simple RF amperemeter. Resonance <=> peak current (except you're using a class E PA). Works on LF and MF! 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: eeb98d9e5f7535b37e24952fd7f85252 Subject: Re: LF: Antenna tuner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410e509051ac78ba X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Steinar, Instead of a HF SWR meter i vote for building a simple RF amperemeter.=20 Resonance <=3D> peak current (except you're using a class E PA). Works o= n=20 LF and MF! 73, Stefan Am 30.10.2012 22:27, schrieb Graham: > Depends on how much power you are going to use ..... 50 / 70 =20 > watts , you can get away with a big version of a top band =20 > tuner , parallel tapped tuner .....over this voltage /=20 > flashover becomes a problem for a end fed Ae , I use a top =20 > loading coil, seems to keep the atu voltage down .. > > Over that , you need to use a auto transformer and series =20 > variable inductance , luckily most normal HF swr meters read at =20 > 500 , which makes tuning a lot simpler ........but if you =20 > cannot reach 1:1 , you could have harmonics , the swr meter ,=20 > showing the reflected harmonics from the Ae load .. > > A good reason to use a wide band swr metering system ... band =20 > only ones will miss out of band harmonics > > At gb4fpr , feeding 200/300 watts in to the 600 ft delta=20 > loop, there is very little voltage in the tuner > > 73 -G. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Steinar Aanesland" > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 9:03 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: Antenna tuner > >> Hi, thanks for the feedbacks from both of you . >> >> >> "Why using such a big monster tuner? Because it is commercial?" Hehe, >> absolutely not Stefan :) but a ham friend of my gave it to me when he >> heard about my 600m transverter project. I will probably take it a par= t >> an use it for other antenna projects. >> >> I am now planing to make my own variometer, just for the fun of it. I = am >> a novice you know , and I have to take the small steps to learn. I cam= e >> across this page describing in easy terms how to make a variometer, >> http://www.giangrandi.ch/electronics/shortanttuner/shortanttuner.shtml= . >> It seems not be too difficult :) >> >> LA5VNA Steinar >> loc:JO59jq >> Mal and spam filtering: STRONG >> www.opera.no >> >> >> >> >> Den 30.10.2012 21:37, skrev Stefan Sch=E4fer: >>> Steinar, >>> >>> Graham is right, the coil may be to small for a small amateur antenna. >>> >>> Why using such a big monster tuner? Because it is commercial? >>> >>> We have only 7 kHz of spectrum and assuming "normal" sourrounding >>> losses, you will not even need a variometer part. So it is just a coi= l, >>> some wire on a PVC tube and a ferrite transformer (or a tap or what y= ou >>> prefer), then cox to the shack. >>> >>> No problem! :-) >>> >>> 73, Stefan >>> >>> >>> Am 30.10.2012 21:24, schrieb Graham: >>>> Steiner >>>> >>>> That looks a little 1.6 MHz ish to me .coils may be not >>>> big enough . could be the 500 variometer is missing from th= e >>>> space ? >>>> >>>> could make a auto transformer , next need a series coil of >>>> sorts , Ae cap will do the rest >>>> >>>> G.. >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------- >>>> From: "Steinar Aanesland" >>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 2:09 PM >>>> To: >>>> Subject: LF: Antenna tuner >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> Is there anyone out there who is familiar with this antenna tuner? >>>>> >>>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.49.15.jpg >>>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.49.36.jpg >>>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.49.50.jpg >>>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.50.00.jpg >>>>> >>>>> I got it from a HAM friend and will try to use it to tune my 600m >>>>> antenna. The trouble is that some parts are missing. >>>>> >>>>> --=20 >>>>> LA5VNA Steinar >>>>> loc:JO59jq >>>>> Mal and spam filtering: STRONG >>>>> www.opera.no >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >>