Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 49D0F380000B4; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:04:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTIyY-0005Na-Ki for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:03:54 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTIyY-0005NR-5g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:03:54 +0000 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTIyV-0003jO-Fd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:03:53 +0000 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTP id <0MCQ001MN55JTO20@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:03:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.48.212.1]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u3-15.01 64bit (built Feb 12 2010)) with ESMTPA id <0MCQ007JV55JEEF0@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:03:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:03:19 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland In-reply-to: <50903AA3.1040502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-id: <50904097.5060800@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 References: <508FDF4E.7070109@broadpark.no> <508FDF88.8020706@broadpark.no> <500F0ABE29C140E7BA52A38E66D5F7D9@AGB> <50903AA3.1040502@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, thanks for the feedbacks from both of you . "Why using such a big monster tuner? Because it is commercial?" Hehe, absolutely not Stefan :) but a ham friend of my gave it to me when he heard about my 600m transverter project. I will probably take it a part an use it for other antenna projects. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1908b49407fc556987226b536cc4bad0 Subject: Re: LF: Antenna tuner Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604c509040e048d4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi, thanks for the feedbacks from both of you . "Why using such a big monster tuner? Because it is commercial?" Hehe, absolutely not Stefan :) but a ham friend of my gave it to me when he heard about my 600m transverter project. I will probably take it a pa= rt an use it for other antenna projects. I am now planing to make my own variometer, just for the fun of it. I= am a novice you know , and I have to take the small steps to learn. I ca= me across this page describing in easy terms how to make a variometer, http://www.giangrandi.ch/electronics/shortanttuner/shortanttuner.shtm= l . It seems not be too difficult :) LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: STRONG www.opera.no Den 30.10.2012 21:37, skrev Stefan Sch=E4fer: > Steinar, >=20 > Graham is right, the coil may be to small for a small amateur anten= na. >=20 > Why using such a big monster tuner? Because it is commercial? >=20 > We have only 7 kHz of spectrum and assuming "normal" sourrounding > losses, you will not even need a variometer part. So it is just a c= oil, > some wire on a PVC tube and a ferrite transformer (or a tap or what= you > prefer), then cox to the shack. >=20 > No problem! :-) >=20 > 73, Stefan >=20 >=20 > Am 30.10.2012 21:24, schrieb Graham: >> Steiner >> >> That looks a little 1.6 MHz ish to me .coils may be no= t=20 >> big enough . could be the 500 variometer is missing from = the=20 >> space ? >> >> could make a auto transformer , next need a series coil of= =20 >> sorts , Ae cap will do the rest >> >> G.. >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Steinar Aanesland" >> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 2:09 PM >> To: >> Subject: LF: Antenna tuner >> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> Is there anyone out there who is familiar with this antenna tuner= ? >>> >>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.49.15.jpg >>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.49.36.jpg >>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.49.50.jpg >>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/2012-10-29%2023.50.00.jpg >>> >>> I got it from a HAM friend and will try to use it to tune my 600m >>> antenna. The trouble is that some parts are missing. >>> >>> --=20 >>> LA5VNA Steinar >>> loc:JO59jq >>> Mal and spam filtering: STRONG >>> www.opera.no >>> >>> >>> >=20 >=20 >=20