Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9854838000093; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 09:53:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTCEr-0001oj-V3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:52:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTCEr-0001oa-Db for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:52:17 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTCEp-0000nc-Aq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:52:16 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9UDqE40026659 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:52:14 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q9UDqDxQ008541 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:52:13 +0100 Message-ID: <508FDB86.5030304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:52:06 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <87D0548217184BC58AF939DEA4CF768C@intelp4> <8CF84A2D46CF8AF-FDC-4F78A@webmail-m161.sysops.aol.com> <508FD82A.4070202@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <508FD82A.4070202@broadpark.no> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q9UDqE40026659 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Steinar, Markus, LF, That is all very strage. After the transmission in the afternoon and evening using JT9-30 i think i will go back to the usual modes until Joe has some good ideas :-) Have to work on the step down converter that works better and better now! [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 09c1a181dc7b5fd4ce37590584a561d1 Subject: Re: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4090508fdbc74f23 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Steinar, Markus, LF, That is all very strage. After the transmission in the afternoon and=20 evening using JT9-30 i think i will go back to the usual modes until Joe=20 has some good ideas :-) Have to work on the step down converter that works better and better now! 73, cu, Stefan Am 30.10.2012 14:37, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: > Hi Markus > > I had no luck with Stefan last evening , no asterisks and no echo > > 2315 5 -29 -0.8 1432.73 0.00 > 2320 10 -12 0.2 1439.73 0.00 > 2325 5 -29 0.4 1428.55 0.00 > 2330 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00 > 2335 4 -30 0.0 1420.20 0.00 > 2340 10 -14 0.2 1439.73 0.00 > 2345 6 -29 0.2 1427.61 0.00 > 2350 10 -19 0.2 1439.73 0.00 > 2355 10 -23 0.4 1429.87 0.00 > 0000 10 -18 0.2 1439.73 0.00 > 0005 10 -25 0.0 1429.84 0.00 > 0010 10 -17 0.2 1439.73 0.00 > 0015 0 -33 0.9 1456.33 0.00 > 0020 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00 > 0025 1 -33 0.0 1451.72 0.00 > 0030 10 -12 0.0 1439.73 0.00 > 0035 10 -26 0.2 1429.83 0.00 DF6NM GN ALL > 0040 0 -34 0.4 1440.21 0.00 000AAA 000AAA RA90 > > I managed to decode your signal > even if it looks like you are slightly out of sync. > > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/capt14.jpg > > > > LA5VNA Steinar > loc:JO59jq > Mal and spam filtering: STRONG > www.opera.no > > > > > Den 30.10.2012 11:45, skrev Markus Vester: > =20 >> Similar here, most (but not all) slots decoded successfully, >> =20 > but mostly with asterisks. Strange that the quiet slots at odd > ten minute multiples also achieved 10 sync points - perhaps the > echo effect again? The first line went wrong only because my decoder > was still set to 5 minutes. > =20 >> >> Even with 1 Hz tolerance the CPU is getting pretty busy - maybe in a f= uture version we could select whether we want multiple decodes or not? On= one of my machines I can't use 48 kS/s for WSPR and WSJTx because that s= amplerate is too far off, so being able to choose between 12 and 48 kS/s = aquisition would also be useful. >> >> Best 73, >> Markus (DF6NM) >> >> 0040 10 -24 -0.6 1940.53 0.00 000AAA 000AAA RA90 >> 0050 0 -37 0.0 1938.40 0.00 >> 0100 10 -9 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0110 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0120********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0130 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0140********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0150 10 -19 0.9 1939.85 0.00 >> 0200********* 1.7 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0210 10 -17 -1.3 1939.75 0.00 >> 0220 10 -9 2.2 1939.83 0.00 >> 0230 10 -20 0.9 1939.85 0.00 >> 0240********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0250 10 -17 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0300 10 -9 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0310 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0320********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0330 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0340********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0350 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0400********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0410 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0420********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0430 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0440********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0450 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0500********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0510 10 -19 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0520********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0530 10 -18 0.4 1939.83 0.00 >> 0540********* 1.3 1939.83 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> 0550 10 -18 -1.7 1939.89 0.00 >> 0600 2 -35 0.9 1939.85 0.00 >> >> >> >> >> -----Urspr=FCngliche Mitteilung----- >> Von: Terry GW0EZY<gw0ezy@sky.com> >> An: rsgb_lf_group<rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org> >> Verschickt: Di, 30 Okt 2012 2:36 am >> Betreff: LF: RE: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC >> >> Decode OK but same again =96 Sync and dB values shown as **** (usually= indicates values exceed expected) >> >> 0120********* 0.9 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> >> I have reduced the tolerance to +/- 10. I checked JT9-30 and the Wide = Graph scale shifts again requiring another retune and increase of FFT Bin= s/Pixel to get 1140 kHz on screen (136.3 + 1140) >> >> 73 Terry >> >> >> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@b= lacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Terry GW0EZY >> Sent: 30 October 2012 01:14 >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: LF: JT9-10 Decode DK7FC >> >> >> A decode of your JT9-10 transmission. I wonder why the Sync and dB val= ues are shown as **** ?? >> >> 0100********* 0.4 1138.38 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK >> >> Waiting for JT9-30 ?? >> >> I thought you would prefer to stay with BS =96 sigh! >> >> 73 Terry >> >> >> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@b= lacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Sch=E4fer >> Sent: 30 October 2012 00:49 >> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC-DF6NM >> >> >> >> Am 30.10.2012 01:41, schrieb Terry GW0EZY: >> Stefan getting regular decodes from you =96 every 10 minutes. Will als= o try your JT9-10. Let us all know if another frequency offset is require= d. >> >> No, i'll stay at 137.44 kHz over the night. >> >> >> >> Sending emails is a pain! >> Is it? I like it :-) >> >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >> =20 > > > =20